| #1 IOW, they are affirming that assorted armed fractions are in reality valid extensions of the State andor the State's general armed forces ergo Israel, etc. has the right to de facto mil retaliation against the main Govts and territories no matter their PC, anti-Militia/Terror, legalist rhetoric. SUB-IOW, THE IDF AND DUBYA CAN NOW ATTACK AND CONQUER ALL OF LEBANON, ETAL. AND NO CARE WHAT THE RULING GOVTS THINK AS BY THE COUNCIL'S DECISION ANY ORGANZ TERROR AGS ISRAEL IS BY DEFINITION AN ATTACK AGS ISRAEL BY THE STATE OF LEBANON. |
The Lebanon-based Higher Islamic Shiite Council on Wednesday said anti-Israeli armed resistance was a basic right and armed factions were not militias. In a statement it issued, the council said UN Resolution 1559 was "not applicable." The council added the Lebanese people stood up against Israeli occupation and resisted it, adding that armed resistance was a national right and an indication of patriotism. It praised Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri's initiatives for laying down national dialogue channels, and called for strengthening Lebanese-Syrian relations and easing tension between the two countries.