Submit your comments on this article | |
Bangladesh | |
Bangla: Ahmadiyyas fear for their lives | |
2005-12-21 | |
![]() ‘The government’s submissive policy to the zealots has put our lives at stake and now we have none but Allah to seek help,’ the acting national emir of the Muslim Jamaat, Mir Mobashsher Ali, told a news briefing at the Jamaat’s central office in the city’s Bakhshibazar area. Accusing the government of maintaining a double-standard, he said the government had assured them of safety while allowed the zealots to announce or go for fresh programmes against them. Two components of the 4-party alliance government believe that the Ahmadiyyas are non-Muslims, and they are behind the continued attacks on Ahmadiyyas of the past two and a half years, the chief missionary of the Ahmadiyya community, Abdul Awwal Khan Chowdhury, said. The community leaders said they had informed all, including the prime minister and the home minister, of their apprehension ‘perceived from experience’, but no step was taken yet. They said they were stunned as the government had allowed the religious bigots to conduct ‘ultra-fundamentalist programme’ like cordoning mosque when a drive against the extremists, terrorists and bomb attackers was going on. ‘The programme would lead to a communal anarchy in the country’. ‘We have no reservation on anyone’s right of holding rally or brining out procession, but it should not be allowed that his/her practice of democracy would violate the rights of others,’ Mobashsher said. ‘Bitter experiences recall that the programmes of cordoning Ahmadiyya mosque were excuses for attacking the mosques, residence and members of the community.’ As no action has been taken yet in connection with the attack on mosques, residences and members of the community, it inspired the attackers to declare fresh programme to cordon the Ahmadiyya central mosque, he added. ‘We urge the administration to ensure safety and security of the lives and properties of the community members ahead of the zealots’ programme,’ he said and demanded inquiry into all attacks on Ahmadiyya community and its mosques. | |
Posted by:Fred |
#6 The ironic thing is, those groups most supportive of the Pakistan movement are those that felt the sword arm of the Pak state. The Aga Khan backed partition of the Indian subcontinent but now Ismailis are only safe in India itself, their mosques are attacked in Pak and Bangla. The campaign for Pakistan was strong in East Bengal and the Bengali muslims suffered the most - 3 million dead and tens of thousands raped bybthe Pak army in 1971. The Ahmadis were also backers of Jinnah. Their reward was being outlawed in Pak and soon Bangla. Perversely, the Deobandis and Jamaat Islami called the idea of Pakistan - "the work of the devil" and did not support it. These are now in the forefront of the islamization campaign, seeking to purify the land they did not originally support. Their pogroms have reduced the Sikh and Hindu populations to almost nothing, the Ahmadis are next, then the Ismailis. The biggest cleaning will be the Shia. Musharraf himself allededly participated (as a junior officer) in anti-shia pogroms ordered by General Zia ul Haq. During the Karil war, Pak artillery rained down on the Shia villages in Indian Kashmir. Once the Shia are gone, the non-conformist Sunni will be arabicized the wahabi-deobandi way. |
Posted by: john 2005-12-21 10:36 |
#5 The Mecca thing is a big theological thingie. The Ismailis are also a rather large group not welcome in Soddiland and they end up going to a shrine in Egypt. There are a half dozen or so sects of Islam, all relatively small, that don't get permission to worship at the black rock unless they disguise themselves. |
Posted by: mhw 2005-12-21 09:56 |
#4 The hysterical flap over the passport religion column last year was so no Ahmadis could sneak into Mecca, being non-Muslims and all. ! So now I get it. I thought it was all about the purity of the land of the pure and keeping lesser people of the book out. |
Posted by: Buckminster Spemble1220 2005-12-21 09:12 |
#3 Thanks Paul. I now see that Islam is a religion of peace as long as you embrace jihad of the sword. |
Posted by: Seafarious 2005-12-21 08:09 |
#2 It's a Muslim thing, as the Ahmadiyya's do not accept one of the main tenets of Islam, that Muhammad was the final Prophet; as well as rejecting Jihad of the Sword. Minorities who don't fight back make a very convenient target when you are whipping up the faithful. It's a similar situation to the Bahai's of Iran. |
Posted by: Paul Moloney 2005-12-21 01:24 |
#1 Is this a Moose limb thing or a caste thing? This being PakiWakiBanglastan and all, I s'pose it's a hybrid of the worst features of both. |
Posted by: Seafarious 2005-12-21 00:20 |