Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: WoT |
Bush stands firm on spying order |
2005-12-20 |
![]() The president stood at a podium in the East Room of the White House, hours after a prime-time nationwide speech from the Oval Office in which he said he would prosecute the war in Iraq to a successful conclusion. In opening news conference remarks, Bush said the spying, conducted by the National Security Agency without court oversight, was an essential element in the "war on terror". "It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this important programme in a time of war. The fact that we're discussing this programme is discussing the enemy," he said. The existence of the programme was disclosed last week, triggering an outpouring of criticism in Congress and an unflinching defence from Bush and senior officials of his administration. Bush bristled when asked whether there are limits on presidential power in wartime. "I just described limits on this particular programme, and that's what's important for the American people to understand," Bush said. Normally, no wiretapping is permitted in the US without a court warrant. But Bush said he approved the action without such orders "because it enables us to move faster and quicker. We've got to be fast on our feet". "It is legal to do so. I swore to uphold the laws. Legal authority is derived from the constitution," he added. Raising his voice, Bush challenged Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic leader, and Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democratic senator - without naming them - to allow a final vote on legislation renewing the anti-terrorism Patriot Act. "I want senators from New York or Los Angeles or Las Vegas to explain why these cities are safer" without the extension, Bush said. |
Posted by:Fred |
#2 Old Spook, or other: How can violation of secrecy laws BE prosecuted without exposing more secrets? It would seem you would need a secret trial in a secret court with a secret jury - which would seem to be unconstitutional. But there must be some sort of enforcement mechanism. What is it? |
Posted by: Glenmore 2005-12-20 08:31 |
#1 "It was a shameful act for someone to disclose this important programme ..." "...I swore to uphold the laws..." OK, let's see you uphold the laws on treason and prosecute this disclosure. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2005-12-20 08:28 |