You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House rejects troop withdrawal timetable
2005-12-17
For the second time in as many months, the House rejected calls for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq with a vote Friday that Democrats said was politically driven and designed by Republicans to limit debate on the war. In a 279-109 vote, the GOP-controlled House approved a resolution saying the chamber is committed "to achieving victory in Iraq" and that setting an "artificial timetable" would be "fundamentally inconsistent with achieving victory." Democrats voted against the resolution by a roughly two-to-one margin, underlining splits within the party over alternatives to President Bush's Iraq war policies.

Democrats called the vote a political stunt, and offered an alternative statement simply congratulating Iraqis for holding three successful elections this year but not mentioning withdrawal or victory. Republicans rejected it. Instead, the House GOP maneuvered for its own resolution, as Democratic calls for an immediate or eventual troop pullout intensified in the weeks since prominent a Democratic hawk, Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, said it was time for U.S. troops to start coming home. Some Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, have lined up behind him.

The minority party also complained that Republicans were intentionally limiting debate on Iraq by scheduling a vote as lawmakers are under pressure to finish their work so they can adjourn for the year. Several dozen Democrats - some wearing "Debate Iraq" buttons - filed to the floor to "request an open debate" on the war.
Posted by:Pappy

#3  All these negative and "present" votes will come back to haunt the donks in '06. The majority of US citizens are not for immature withdrawal, they want to finish the job.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-12-17 21:51  

#2  Notice how the vote changed from 400+ against last time. Ms. Pelosi sends out orders to her subjects to vote against the first bill and then in the second sends out the position that they can have diversity in their position. The brain dead lefty trolls who broadstroke Reps as lockstep bots never seem to see their own in the same light. Which is why their comments are buried and ignored upon posting when they revert all so often to style.
Posted by: Ulaing Angonter4916   2005-12-17 09:05  

#1  "it's a trick! Vote against For present"
Posted by: Frank G   2005-12-17 01:01  

00:00