You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran's Mysterious Spy Satellite
2005-11-28
November 28, 2005: Iran is claiming that it’s new Sina-1 photo-reconnaissance satellite is capable of performing espionage, especially against Israel. Launched in October, on a Russian rocket, the satellite was described as being used for scientific purposes only. With a three year lifetime, the Iranians described the Sina-1 camera equipment as capable of 50 meter resolution (pictures taken allow the identification of any object 50 meters wide or larger.) This is not military grade resolution. You can get better stuff from Google Earth.

Russia built the 375 pound satellite, and is unlikely to have provided higher resolution (and much more expensive) camera gear. Besides, you can’t get high res equipment into a satellite of that size. But Russia also has a $132 million contract with Iran, to build and launch Iran’s first communication satellite, so the Russians are not saying much about the Iranian claims. The “spy satellite” claim by Iran is apparently for domestic consumption, another attempt to show the Iranian people that the country is getting its money’s worth with all these expensive satellite deals, and to buff the country’s anti-Israeli reputation. However, Iran is also building a second spy satellite, which Russia will launch early next year. Iran has never been shy about stealing high tech secrets, although getting their hands on all the stuff they would need for a high res bird is unlikely.
Posted by:Steve

#10  If he does not have a gun, his having a knife may make him less inclined to get a gun.

There in lies the explanation why the Russians never seem to find peace.

1. he's not a gunman without a gun
2. maybe he didn't even have a knife
3. Who says having a knife doesn't make him want a gun?
4. Now that he has a knife, he can steal a gun

So the real moral of the story is: A guy comes to town, talks a bunch of BS and so he gets a free knife, which he uses to strong-arm a gun and thus the unarmed man becomes a gunman.
Posted by: 2b   2005-11-28 21:51  

#9  Ron on military strategy: We win. They lose."
Posted by: Saddamn Husseinb   2005-11-28 20:57  

#8  Of course big Ron was backed up by thousands and thousands of air-launched, preassembled, macro sdfaodifaio 2345 adfl;asdfkgng iru4

Carry on.
Posted by: doubel O Hatfield   2005-11-28 19:14  

#7  Yep. I remember when Ronnie rode into town. The USSR offered him a space-based laser, Ronnie demmured and asked for a milkshake, stirred, no straw.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-11-28 19:09  

#6  The Iranians should remember real western history:

When a "gunman" came to town, he more than likely was asked to surrender his weapons (sound familiar?) and ,upon refusal, chances are he was killed later by a 12-Ga shot to the back, so as to avoid collateral damage and threat to the lawmen
Posted by: Frank G   2005-11-28 18:26  

#5  I like moose's analogy, but doubt the russians are so concerned about the Iranians not having sattellite launchers. They are just playing games with the Mullahs as usual to provide a hedge against the West and make a few bucks to boot.

The russian space agancy will do anything for a buck.

A friend of mine recently got back from Russia, he went with Gregory Olsen, America's most recent space tourist and ISS joy-rider who is a college buddy of his.

Greg paid his $20 mil and rode the beast to the ISS, but said it was worth every penny. All the guys said that the Russians were in bad shape, and that it seemed to them like if were it not for the space tourist the ISS wouldn't have a single Russian on it at all.

So the Russians need money and the Iranians have plenty to waste evidently.

EP
Posted by: ElvisHasLeftTheBuilding   2005-11-28 17:06  

#4  There is a method in Russia's madness, though it's questionable whether the technique works or not.

Basically, it is: "When the gunman comes to town, and you do not known his intentions, nor can you see his gun, offer him a knife. If he does not have a gun, his having a knife may make him less inclined to get a gun. If he does have a gun, perhaps he will choose to use his knife instead, creating a smaller risk. Even if he has a gun and intent to use it, giving him a knife is of small matter--he will do no more harm with it than he will do with his gun."

This philosophy could be applied both to long range missiles and nuclear material. In the first case, the Russian attitude is to make them a satellite and launch it, so that the Iranians don't make their own satellite and launcher.

In the second case, they offer the Iranians nuclear fuel and to reprocess their old fuel--no need for the Iranians to do it.

I really doubt that the Russians are doing this out of the milk of human kindness.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-11-28 15:36  

#3  Damn straight, Shep. God knows what else is on that bird. What the hell were the Ruskies thinking?

Blow it to hell. We need the practice anyway.
Posted by: mojo   2005-11-28 13:58  

#2  shoot it down - no Orcs in space
Posted by: Shep UK   2005-11-28 11:55  

#1  "Sina-1 is a research satellite. It's not possible to use it for military purposes," said Deputy Telecom Minister Ahmad Talebzadeh, who heads the space program. But he agreed it could spy on Israel. "Technically speaking, yes. It can monitor Israel," he told The Associated Press. "But we don't need to do it. You can buy satellite photos of Israeli streets from the market."

Yea, that Suk imagery simply can't be beat.
Posted by: Besoeker   2005-11-28 11:15  

00:00