You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
'Dirty Bomb' Suspect Padilla Indicted
2005-11-22
"Dirty Bomb" suspect Jose Padilla, held by the U.S. as an enemy combatant for more than three years, has been indicted on federal charges in Miami, according to an indictment unsealed Tuesday. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales was expected to discuss the indictment at a news conference in Washington. Padilla, a Brooklyn-born Muslim convert, has been held as an "enemy combatant" in Defense Department custody for more than three years. The Bush administration had resisted calls to charge and try him in civilian courts.

The indictment avoids a Supreme Court showdown. Padilla's lawyers had asked justices to review his case last month, and the Bush administration was facing a deadline next Monday for filing its legal arguments. "They're avoiding what the Supreme Court would say about American citizens. That's an issue the administration did not want to face," said Scott Silliman, a Duke University law professor who specializes in national security. "There's no way that the Supreme Court would have ducked this issue."

The Bush administration has said Padilla, a former Chicago gang member, sought to blow up hotels and apartment buildings in the United States and planned an attack with a "dirty bomb" radiological device. Padilla was arrested at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport in 2002 after returning from Pakistan. The federal government has said he was trained in weapons and explosives by members of al-Qaida. Although the Justice Department has said that Padilla was readying attacks in the United States, the charges against him and four others allege they were part of a conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim persons in a foreign country and provide material support to terrorists abroad.
Posted by:tu3031

#7  Officially, thank gosh it's on -- so that it's immune from Supreme Court wrangling. I distinctly recall Antonin Scalia's ruling in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld being, guess what? "Charge or release."
Posted by: Edward Yee   2005-11-22 16:01  

#6  Using the lefts dictionary of law this would mean that Padilla is guilty and wee should move to the sentencing phase.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-11-22 14:49  

#5  Actually, there are precedents of stripping US citizens of their citizenship if they take up arms against this country for a hostile power. More than 2500 Americans were conscripted into the German & Italian armies, and about 1300 into the Japanese military, during World War II. The last I remember reading, voluntarily entering the military services of a foreign power, whether an ally or an enemy, can be used to end US citizenship. We need one of Rantburg's lawyers to check it out and give us the straight skinny.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-11-22 13:32  

#4  Steve, right on.

Robert, that's a bridge too far for me. But then again, I'm one of those who actually value my citizenship.
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia   2005-11-22 12:44  

#3  While we (apparently) can't do it in his case, among the penalties for terrorism should be stripping of citizenship. Yes, I realize he was born in the US. Doesn't matter.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-11-22 12:38  

#2  Ack, that was me from a different computer.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-11-22 11:47  

#1  About time. Try him fair and hang him fair.

I do believe, I must say, that all American citizens should have their day in court. We should never have a situation in which the government can hold a citizen indefinitely. It's one of the basic rights of citizenship, and one that doesn't apply to foreigners captured on foreign soil in a time of war and interred in a facility on foreign soil.
Posted by: Jatch Glock7171   2005-11-22 11:46  

00:00