| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Britain | |
| Ex-envoy: Blair 'seduced' by U.S. | |
| 2005-11-07 | |
| Prime Minister Tony Blair was "seduced by the glamour of U.S. power" in the build-up to the Iraq war and repeatedly failed to influence U.S. policy, a former top British diplomat said in comments published on Monday. Christopher Meyer, a former British ambassador in Washington Now writing his book.... who was heavily involved in the pre-war planning, said Blair was reluctant to negotiate conditions with President George W. Bush over Britain's support for war. Blair did not use his position as Washington's most important ally to delay the start of the war to give more time to plan for what to do after the fall of Saddam Hussein, Meyer said.... er huh, Chris...did you make any suggestions/recommendations at the time? "Britain should have made its participation in any war dependent on a fully worked-out plan, please show us YOUR plan... agreed by both sides, for the rehabilitation of Iraq after Saddam's demise," Meyer wrote in memoirs serialized in two British newspapers on Monday. "We may have been the junior partner in the enterprise, but the ace up our sleeve was that America did not want to go it alone." Meyer, ambassador in Washington from 1997 to February 2003 but now retired from the diplomatic service, said Britain's failure to press for more planning was still being felt. "Had Britain insisted, Iraq after Saddam might shoulda-coulda-woulda but didn't have avoided the violence that may yet prove fatal to the entire enterprise," he wrote. He said in the Guardian and the Daily Mail that delaying the invasion from spring 2003 to the autumn would have given more time for planning for the aftermath and might have made it possible to agree on a second United Nations resolution. Yea Chris, additional UN resolutions were the hidden key all along. "History's verdict looks likely to be that it was terminally flawed both in conception and execution," he wrote. And your fix is? Meyer rejected the view that Blair blindly followed Bush, but said the British prime minister and his team were swayed by the power of the White House. "Blair chose to take his stand ... from the highest moral ground," Meyer wrote. "It is the definitive riposte to 'Blair the Poodle', seduced though he and his team always appeared to be by the proximity and glamour of American power." Yea, we all find 'W' quite sedductive lol, you cringing Poodle buggering fagot! Meyer's criticisms come after a damaging week ....thats it, just like rugby, pile on... for Blair during which he faced a rebellion in parliament over planned anti-terrorism laws and saw a key ally resign. Blair, who won his third consecutive election in May, faced widespread opposition from within his ruling Labour Party and the wider public over his support for the 2003 invasion.
| |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #1 "History's verdict looks likely to be that it was terminally flawed both in conception and execution,..." Why don't we let "history" be the judge of that, Chris. It's your judgement that seems terminally flawed. |
| Posted by: Xbalanke 2005-11-07 12:24 |