| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- |
| "Boobs not bombs" not political speech |
| 2005-11-06 |
| A federal judge denied on Friday a request from a group of Mendocino women who wanted to protest topless on the grounds of the state Capitol. U.S. District Judge Garland Burrell said the group made no compelling argument that showing their breasts constitutes free speech. "Being topless is not inherently expressive" speech It depends on cup size., Burrell said. The group, Breasts Not Bombs, had scheduled a protest for noon Monday. The California Highway Patrol threatened to Sherry Glaser, a leader of the group, said the protest may take place without bare breasts. "All we really have is the power of ourselves," she said. "Our bodies bring attention." I've seen the pics. Most of your bodies repel attention. Group members, whose protest on the west steps of the Capitol is intended to contrast the "indecent" initiatives backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on the November ballot with their " The First Amendment protects their right to protest bare breasted, the group argued. "The very act is a dynamic and fully expressive statement worthy of constitutional protection," their brief asserts. But Burrell didn't buy that argument. "Do you think the Lawyers for the state said no previous group has been allowed to protest on Capitol grounds unclothed. Those protesters who have disrobed were ordered to put their clothes on or face arrest. "It has always been our policy that we do not allow nudity on the Capitol's grounds," said Tom Marshall, a CHP spokesman. Allowing public nudity on the Capitol grounds would also be disruptive and possibly dangerous, the state argued. "The state Capitol is a destination for California residents and tourists from around the world. Hundreds of California schoolchildren visit on a daily basis. They often enjoy their lunch on the west steps of the Capitol," the lawyers for the attorney general's office wrote. "What visitors to the Capitol do not and cannot expect is to see topless adults and children engaged in public nudity under the guise of political protest." |
| Posted by:Jackal |
| #3 Keep me abreast of further developments. |
| Posted by: Captain America 2005-11-06 22:36 |
| #2 insufficient evidence |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-11-06 17:16 |
| #1 Wait till this thing goes The decision will come down in favor of the Boobs (pun intended) and the school kids will be denied lunch on the state Capitol steps because they are a special interest group. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2005-11-06 16:40 |