| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| US Spy Imagery Agency ? Defends Its Work Against Critics |
| 2005-10-20 |
| Puts on Owen Williams I-Spy impersonation mask.. Gee! I didn't know we had a SPY Imagery Agency! That is Soooo Cooool! Must be Carlos' hangout, he gets all the nifty toys! The head of the US spy imagery agency defended the work of his organization on Wednesday, saying the satellite photos, digital graphics and maps it generates were more in demand than ever by military and other government departments. "You must have, I believe, what is the geographical, the geospatial setting, whatever the problem is," said James Clapper, a retired Air Force lieutenant general and head of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA). Oh,darn. The bozos at Agence France-Presse have to slant the headlines. No Spy Imagery Agency for you! "Everything, everybody has to be in some place," Clapper told reporters. For our enemies the appropriate place is approximately 2 meters below ground... but impalement on a roadside pike works for me too... The NGA has faced sharp criticism in the US Congress, where members have questioned the agency's effectiveness in the war in Iraq and the broader effort to track potential terrorist threats. Hmmm, I think I smell some Democrats... According to The Washington Post, the director of national intelligence, John Negroponte, is due to release recommendations soon on the role of satellite spying activities. Clapper rejected allegations that demand for the NGA's product was on the decline among government agencies. "I have not seen it for my last four years. In fact, the opposite has been true," he said. The US Central Command, or CentCom, which oversees US troops in Iraq and throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, was "our primary customer", he said. "In the phase we are in now, the emphasis is on recovery, reconstruction. So we provide a lot of infrastructure kinds of data," Clapper said. A report published in April by an independent commission, charged with analyzing the failures of US intelligence in the search for possible weapons of mass destruction under Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq, underlined the limits of satellite imagery in the US-led invasion of 1993. The report found that satellite photos failed to prove useful in locating chemical and biological weapons sites. |
| Posted by:DanNY |
| #8 "#5 Owen Wilson?" Frank, You really do need to get out more! Hehehe |
| Posted by: DanNY 2005-10-20 22:07 |
| #7 why continue to build and launch spy sats when we can just buy images from a commercial service like SPOT Why build a Formula 1 race car when Ferrari sells fast vehicles? Why have secure tactical radios when cell phones work fine most places? Why ..... LOL |
| Posted by: lotp 2005-10-20 13:17 |
| #6 Not NRO. NRO designs/launches/manages imagery satellites. NGA, formerly NIMA, manages the resulting imagery products but also integrates mapping references, terrain analysis etc. into their interpretation. |
| Posted by: lotp 2005-10-20 13:15 |
| #5 Owen Wilson? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2005-10-20 13:14 |
| #4 As useful as satellite imagery is it is no substitue for on the ground old fashioned intelligence. And if there where failures in the Gulf this is where it was at. Not in the imagery and intercept areas IMO. Another arguement being used in some quarters is why continue to build and launch spy sats when we can just buy images from a commercial service like SPOT. Which IIRC is run by the freaking French |
| Posted by: Cheaderhead 2005-10-20 13:02 |
| #3 Sounds like the old Defence Mapping Agency. Get your GPS coordinates right here. |
| Posted by: ed 2005-10-20 12:40 |
| #2 List of (major) US Intelligence agencies. http://www.fas.org/irp/official.html |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-10-20 12:11 |
| #1 NRO |
| Posted by: mojo 2005-10-20 11:52 |