You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi Columnist: Jihadist Salafist Ideology is Like Nazism
2005-10-19
"Why Aren't We Fighting the Religious Scholars, Theoreticians, and Preachers of Terrorism like Criminals, Murderers, and Robbers?"
Saudi columnist Muhammad bin 'Abd Al-Latif Aal Al-Sheikh published two articles in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, in which he attacked the ideology of the Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya movement. He said that the ideology of this movement was similar to, or even worse than, the Nazi ideology, and that it should be dealt accordingly.
After the ruin, destruction, and bloodshed that Nazism brought upon mankind, [and since] the number of its victims reached tens of millions, the world arose to fight against this murderous ideology, and all steps were taken – on the ideological, cultural, and political levels – to prevent this ideology from spreading anew. The question arises of why, in light of the similarity between these two ideologies, we haven't learned a lesson from this human experience, and why we are not fighting against the foundations of [Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya] – its religious scholars, its theoreticians, and its preachers – just as we deal with criminals, murderers, and robbers?

Abu Muhammad Al-Maqdisi, for instance, claims in his well-known book Millat Ibrahim [The Religion of Abraham, i.e. Islam] – a book that is a kind of manifesto for Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya – that the concept of jihad in Islam should be directed against internal [enemies] before [it is directed] externally, 'since the danger from the immediate vicinity, from its influence, its corruption, and from the internal strife that it engenders, is greater and more severe than the danger of that which is distant and not imminent... Thus, internal jihad and jihad [against] Satan take priority over jihad against enemies in general. The Prophet Muhammad did not start off [by fighting] the Persians, Byzantines, and Jews while ignoring [the Arab infidels] in whose midst he lived, [but rather began with jihad against the Arab infidels].'

Thus, the concept of jihad has become a destructive terrorist concept
 This idea is a formative and decisive idea in the platform of the modern Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya. In his call to murder – which they consider jihad – Abu Muhammad Al-Maqdisi is a criminal and a murderer. How can we find him innocent?..."
Posted by:Fred

#5  I agree with Dot com.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-10-19 13:52  

#4  interesting comment.
Posted by: 2b   2005-10-19 10:44  

#3  Nice comment ^00^
Posted by: Flit   2005-10-19 04:54  

#2  Oops, lost the close italics tag.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-19 02:15  

#1  Interesting piece, but not what it seems on first glance. On the surface it appears he's condemning "extreme" Islam, which we would likely presume includes Wahhabism, a rather dangerous thing to do publicly in SaoodiLand. But that's not the case. Two points... First, the Saudis don't think of the Wahhabi flavor as extreme at all - it's "normal" to be a Wahhabi in WahhabiLand, lol. Second, his actual complaint and charge is against internal attacks, attacks against Arabs, Saudis, Wahhabists, who are, in his view, less "extreme" and, thus, infidels to the super-duper pious Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya. He's stating the standard House of Saud position. They are pious Wahhabis. They're just not pious enough for these "Islamonazis". So they're victims and these guys are "terrorists".

How cold is cold? If you can't tell the difference between -50° and -60° - does it matter? Not a helluvalot - both will kill you - you just freeze a little bit faster.

Wahhabists may not be as "extreme" as the Al-Salafiyya Al-Jihadiyya flavor, but both have, as far as we're concerned, the same end goal. From a Western POV, it's rather fascinating that they focus on their "less pious" co-religionists first - and it's definitely comical to hear the Wahhabis squeal about "extremists" and invoking the Nazis to paint themselves as innocents, victims.

Nazis? Both qualify, actually. I'd like to fry them both up.

Popcorn?
Posted by: .com   2005-10-19 02:14  

00:00