You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Explaining Why So Many Conservatives Are Angry About Harriet Miers /Basketball Analogy
2005-10-05
Good article by Right Wing News.

Let's say you and 4 friends have been playing pick-up basketball with another 5 guys for a while. The games are pretty evenly matched and as a general rule, one team is as likely to win as the other.

Well, you and the other team place a huge bet on your game next Saturday: $5000 a head goes to the winning team. Everybody on the team is jazzed up, everybody is talking about it and suddenly you catch an incredible, once in a lifetime break. One of the regular players on your team won't be able to make it and according to rules everyone agreed on, you get anyone you want as a replacement.

The reason that's such good news is that one of the guys on your team actually works for the NBA and he knows lots of pro-basketball players who have all agreed to fill in if he asks. Suddenly, everybody on the team is debating whom they want to play on Saturday. Would the team be better off with Jermaine O'Neal or Allen Iverson? Would it better to have LeBron James or Tim Duncan? Yao Ming or Ben Wallace?

So everyone is on Cloud 9, waiting for the coach to come back with his selection and he chooses....Tom, whom he plays basketball with in his back yard. Mouths drop open, people start to curse, everyone is disappointed and Coach W. says: "Don't worry, I've seen Tom play and he'll be a great addition to the team."

This blows everyone's mind. With so much on the line and so many great players waiting in the wings, why in the world would the coach select his buddy Tom? To this, the coach says: "Trust me, Tom will be fantastic! You'll love him! See you on Saturday."

This is where we are on the Miers nomination, except the stakes are infinitely higher. We have a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court on the line, a large number of extremely well qualified judges with great track records ready to go, and Bush is picking a pal and telling us to trust his judgement. Of course, if he had great judgement, he would have never picked Miers for the position in the first place.

But, as some Bush defenders are pointing out, Miers may do just fine on the Supreme Court. Agreed. But given the extreme paucity of her track record, it's also entirely possible that she will turn out to be another Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, or even a David Souter. That's the problem.

We have 55 Republicans in the Senate, a President who has been promising for years to appoint judges like Scalia and Thomas to the bench, and now, when the stakes are the highest, conservatives are being presented with a woman who is essentially a coin flip: heads we win, tails we lose. That's just not good enough under the circumstances...

Posted by:mmurray821

#4  The sports analogy is even more painful when you realize that Bush's sports legacy is trading away Sammy Sosa.
Posted by: Penguin   2005-10-05 16:17  

#3  And a lot of moderates who voted for Bush are fed up with the hardcore on the right as much as on the left.

I'm sick of people who want an ideological bloodbath in this country. We are facing massive dangers over the next decade+ -- forget about Iraq and al Qaeda and look at the conversions to Islam among the far left revolutionary leaders in the countries to our south. And that's only the terror threat.

And the hard right would rather start an ideology bloodbath than help this president hold the country together and keep pursuing the GWOT -- which is what the Miers nomination is all about: protecting the Patriot Act, keeping Gitmo open etc.

Idiots. Damaging, dangerous, infantile, STUPID idiots, to be precise.

IMO of course.
Posted by: Fed Up   2005-10-05 16:05  

#2  We have 55 Republicans in the Senate

That counts the RINOs and those with a record of cold feet. The unfortunate fact the hard core is unwilling to recognize. You're not going to be able to change those any time soon. Not backing a RINO means the Dems get the seat, its the nature of the constituency base in the states.
Posted by: Javirt Thrusing6823   2005-10-05 12:11  

#1  Hosed again...
Posted by: Shaq   2005-10-05 11:57  

00:00