You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
UK mulling treating Islamist extremists as brainwashing victims
2005-10-03
LAHORE: British Home Secretary Charles Clarke is studying proposals to combat Islamic terrorist groups by treating them as religious cults, the Sunday Telegraph reported. Sources told the newspaper that Clarke believes that anti-brainwashing techniques used to “deprogramme” cult members could represent a useful weapon in the war against extremism, especially in the wake of the London bombings.
If you're not going to simply blow their brains out when you catch them, I suppose this is the next best thing. If they were to put me in charge of designing the program, I'd work real hard to convert them to agnosticism.
I think .com can get us the necessary equipment at wholesale prices.
Sources close to the Home Secretary told the Sunday Telegraph that he thinks it misguided to categorise Islamist extremists in the “classic” mould of revolutionaries fighting for a political cause. Instead, a closer parallel should be drawn with recruits to cults, who often come from educated backgrounds and are “brainwashed” into renouncing society. One example, Clarke said, was Mohammed Atta, the leader of the September 11 hijackers, who was an architect graduate. Mohammed Sidique Khan, one of the London bombers, was a classroom assistant in Leeds and was married with a baby daughter.
Except that professional revolutionaries are usually drawn from the ranks of the upper middle classes. But loosening their turbans might help, and will probably be more effective than having the local holy men chat with them, like they do in Soddy Arabia and Yemen. But I'd still overfeed them, just in case.
The Home Secretary made special reference to work of Inform, an organisation specialising in cults, which emphasises the need to perceive how victims of brainwashing see their circumstances, the paper reported.
Posted by:Fred

#13  Can I just use this rock hard maple "stick" I got and bypass the electric stunning? I am out of practice and I migfht get winded and hit some place that your are not supposed to though. Stuff happens.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2005-10-03 20:13  

#12  Hire Number Six to do it!
Posted by: 3dc   2005-10-03 19:53  

#11  it finally dawned on me Tu.... :)
Posted by: Shipman   2005-10-03 15:35  

#10  Damn, Steve ... now you've gone and encouraged .com to keep talking about his tool ....
Posted by: lotp   2005-10-03 12:51  

#9  I recommend the 20" 500KV Stun baton for Muzzy wranglin'

I knew you'd have the right tool for the job :-)
Posted by: Steve White   2005-10-03 12:15  

#8  "Clockwork Orange"? I forget. Did that work?
Posted by: tu3031   2005-10-03 10:17  

#7  I prefer the "rat in the kitchen" treatment myself.
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-10-03 09:47  

#6  if the battery dies at an inconvenient moment or one of those mood swings takes you by surprise

ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Shipman   2005-10-03 08:56  

#5  I think it's pretty spiffy that they've finally achieved "victimhood". After eons of whining and killing and seething and banging their heads on the floor 5xday, they've made it.

I recommend the 20" 500KV Stun baton for Muzzy wranglin' - you don't hafta get so close. For youze guys I can let 'em go for, oh, $35 a pop. But don't forget, you're gonna need a shitload of 9V batteries, too. I'll give ya those at cost. Of course that's another reason to go for the baton - you always have the option of thumping 'em all the way to Paradise if the battery dies at an inconvenient moment or one of those mood swings takes you by surprise. Muzzy crowd control and behavior mod for fun and profit. My kinda hobby.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-03 08:17  

#4  The idea that you can deprogram them is dangerous. This religious group isn't your standard cult. Expulsion and detention are the only options if you don't outright terminate them.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2005-10-03 07:48  

#3  Wouldn't it be safer to treat them as rabid dogs? They are, after all, dangerous to others and can infect others with their madness.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-10-03 07:31  

#2  They are psychopaths, social cancers. Deport them if you can. Get them out of circulation any way one can. They have sworn to destroy the British system of government. Treat them as enemies. Action===>consequences. Drive them out of town, make life unbearable for them. They are the enemy and this is war. They do respect power, though, so show some power over them. Sheesh. Brits are going to lose their country. We will to, if we keep up this social PC crap.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-10-03 01:26  

#1  Nearly right. The best option would be to section them under mental health legislation. There's little point sticking them in prison, where they can radicalise others. Put them in secure hospitals, and treat them as you'd treat anyone else suffering from a dangerous psychosis. This might be expensive, but it's the most humane option, IMO.
Posted by: Angomoger Omaiper1128   2005-10-03 01:19  

00:00