| Submit your comments on this article |
| China-Japan-Koreas |
| Japan's new opposition leader seeks to revise pacifist constitution |
| 2005-09-18 |
| Japan's new opposition leader on Sunday sought to revise the nation's pacifist constitution and lift restrictions on Japanese troops' use of weapons overseas. Seiji Maehara, fresh from his slim victory in the Democratic Party of Japan's leadership election on Saturday, said Japan should stipulate its right of self-defence in the US-imposed constitution. "We have to clarify the right to defend ourselves," Maehara said in a television interview. The 43-year-old, nicknamed the "security geek" by his colleagues for his knowledge of national security and North Korea, said Japan should also have the right to back up the United States if its ally was involved in an armed conflict in the region. The constitution, which says Japan forever renounces war, bans Japanese troops from providing support for the US military even if US bases in Japan were under attack. China and to a lesser extent South Korea have been alarmed by moves away from Japan's official pacifism. The new opposition leader also sought to lift restrictions on Japanese troops' use of arms in their peacekeeping activities in other countries, including Iraq. Japan has some 550 troops in the southern Iraqi city of Samawa on a non-combat, humanitarian mission in its first military deployment since 1945 to a country where there is active fighting. The troops, barred by the constitution of 1947 from firing their weapons except in self-defence, have relied on Australia and other countries for their security in Samawa. The largest opposition party held the leadership election after former head Katsuya Okada resigned to take responsibility for a major loss in the September 11 general election against Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's ruling coalition. |
| Posted by:phil_b |
| #3 You better revise it dude, china is going to have to be dealt with at some point and you will need more than a toll free number to the white house to do that. |
| Posted by: Crick Elmuger1423 2005-09-18 23:34 |
| #2 ...US-imposed constitution. It was not imposed. From pbs.org no less: After marathon negotiations in early March, Japanese officials accepted the American draft with only minor revisions. General Whitney's comment at the outset -- "if the cabinet [is] unable to prepare a suitable and acceptable draft.... General MacArthur [is] prepared to lay this statement of principle directly before the people" -- probably helped. Emperor Hirohito, chagrined at having lost so much power but grateful that the throne had been retained, issued an "imperial rescript" endorsing the draft. That fall, after the Japanese people had voted overwhelmingly for candidates who backed the new consitution, Hirohito himself promulgated it before the Diet (Japanese Parliament). Although it ignored his own role in its birth, General MacArthur's message to the nation offered a pretty fair assessment: "The adoption of this liberal charter, together with other progressive measures enacted by the Diet, lays a very solid foundation for the new Japan." The Japanese people supported the constitution then and have so for almost 60 years. It is not a "US-imposed constitution". US-authored? Yes, but Japanese adopted and adhered to since. It is a legitimate geoverning document despite the author's egregious insinuation. |
| Posted by: Zpaz 2005-09-18 14:56 |
| #1 To me this has the sound of someone like John Kerry coming out sounding like a hawk right after having been whipped, campaigning on a dove platform. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-09-18 11:41 |