You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
California Supremes: Heather has two mommies
2005-08-23
In three separate cases, the California Supreme Court yesterday ruled a child legally can have two mothers, effectively expanding the make-up of a family in the state.

The rulings are the first in the nation to grant full parental status to both members of same-sex couples who participated in planning and rearing a child.

In Elisa B. v. Superior Court., the court held that a lesbian who had agreed to raise the children born to her partner, but then split up with her partner, was required to pay child support for the children as a parent.

In K.M. v. E.G., the court held that the existence of a written waiver of rights was no bar to a lesbian woman who had donated ova to her partner to assist in an in vitro fertilization from asserting rights as a parent.

And in Kristine H. v. Lisa R., the court found that a stipulation signed by the natural mother conferred a legal right to her lesbian partner to exercise the role of a parent over the child.

"The California Supreme Court is determined not to be outdone in the aggressive fashioning of new social policy under the guise of deciding legal cases," Stephen Crampton, chief counsel for the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy, said in a statement. "These cases, read together, demonstrate beyond question the social and political agenda of the court. They have little or nothing to do with law."

Continued Crampton: "The arrogance of the California court in attempting to redefine the family by the mere stroke of a pen is nothing short of extraordinary."

In the K.M. v. E.G. case, the state high court, in a 4-2 decision, found lesbian K.M. to be a legal parent.

"A woman who supplies ova to be used to impregnate her lesbian partner, with the understanding that the resulting child will be raised in their joint home, cannot waive her responsibility to support that child," the majority opinion stated. "Nor can such a purported waiver effectively cause that woman to relinquish her parental rights."

In Elisa B. v. Emily B., the court explained that there is no "reason why both parents of a child cannot be women."

"Today's ruling defies logic and common sense," [Mathew Staver, president and general counsel of Liberty Counsel] said. "By saying that children can have two moms, the court has undermined the family. This ruling establishes a policy that essentially says moms and dads are mere surplus. Thousands of studies conclude that children need moms and dads, not two moms and two dads, but one of each. Gender does matter to children.
Posted by:Jackal

#2  In California, even lesbians get screwed in the courts.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy   2005-08-23 23:34  

#1  Today's ruling defies logic and common sense...

Only if you don't understand that law and the constitution are written in an ancient and arcane language that is only comprehensible to lawyers and judges and not by us mere mortal peasant folks. Shhh...and quit questioning your betters.
Posted by: Thrinegum Sleager2196   2005-08-23 16:07  

00:00