You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
700 More Troops to Be Sent To Iraq
2005-08-18
Responding to an appeal for more forces in Iraq to help manage a rising number of detainees, the Pentagon is dispatching an additional 700 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division, defense officials said yesterday. The previously unscheduled deployment is intended specifically to bolster prison operations, the officials said. It is not part of a temporary increase in U.S. troop levels in Iraq that commanders have said is likely to enhance security for a planned constitutional referendum in October and governmental elections in December. "The basic fact driving this deployment is the steady rise in the prison population," said Lt. Col. Barry Venable, a Pentagon spokesman. "There need to be some additional resources devoted to this."

The number of prisoners held in U.S. military detention centers in Iraq has more than doubled since the autumn, climbing from 5,400 in September to more than 10,800 now, according to the latest Pentagon figures. The surge has filled existing prisons to capacity and prompted commanders to embark on an unanticipated prison expansion plan. Military officials have attributed the influx of detainees to intensified counterinsurgency operations by Iraqi as well as U.S. forces. But the burgeoning prison population also appears to reflect the persistence of the insurgency itself.
Also means less catch-and-release.
A formal request for more security forces came in May, officials said, and approval was granted last month. An announcement by the 82nd Airborne Division's headquarters at Fort Bragg, N.C., on Monday saying that the 1st battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment, will be going to Iraq contained no information about the unit's mission. Pentagon officials said the unit will not necessarily provide prison guards but rather engage in a number of detention-related operations, such as securing the area around a prison compound or transporting detainees from one prison to another. "They're going to assist however they're needed," Venable said. "But it's best to think of them as a security force, not as prison guards, although some things they might do could bring them into proximity with prisoners."

The U.S. military runs three main detention centers in Iraq: Camp Bucca in the south and Abu Ghraib and Camp Cropper in the Baghdad area. But anticipating a continued influx of detainees, a fourth prison, called Fort Suse, is being built on the site of a Russian-built former Iraqi military barracks near the northern city of Sulaymaniyah. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, during a visit to Iraq last month, expressed interest in handing responsibility for detainees to Iraqi authorities "as soon as is feasible." But no date has been set for such a transfer.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  To put this into perspective, these are US military prisoners. What percentage are they compared to the number of "ordinary criminal" prisoners held in a country with 25 million people?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-08-18 16:55  

#6  Funny, I didn't see the the Readers' Digest version of unending Abu Ghraib photos and stories put out by WaPo. Or, should I say the paper for fish wrap.

Get real, the juxaposing of "U.S. Fatalities" with "700 More Troops to be Sent to Iraq" is no accident. Last I checked, Readers' Digest doesn't do that.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-18 12:02  

#5  At the end of the op they will hav e taken a lot of p[risoners who will need to be guarded. The WaPo was just giving us the Reader's Digest version.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-08-18 09:25  

#4  ya know I tend to believe yesterday's asertion(think it was yesterday)that these additional troops are for a unit that wiil be used exclusivly for anti-terr ops.Using the 82nd as prision gaurds...I don't think so!How can these WaPo wankers stand the smell,that has to be the nastest colin on the planet.
Posted by: raptor   2005-08-18 07:44  

#3  Military officials have attributed the influx of detainees to intensified counterinsurgency operations by Iraqi as well as U.S. forces. But the burgeoning prison population also appears to reflect the persistence of the insurgency itself.

This is the *same exact line* they use when trying to explain US crime figures -- they never can quite figure out that locking up people makes it difficult for them to victimize innocent people.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-08-18 07:37  

#2  It always amazes me how blantantly antiwar the WaPo is. Every article of this nature has a blazen section at right featuring "Military Fatalities"
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-18 02:45  

#1  It must be driving up demand for women's panties. And with the Olympics rapidly approaching, the human pig pile could be approved as a new event.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-18 02:43  

00:00