Submit your comments on this article | |
Caribbean-Latin America | |
Using oil to spread revolution | |
2005-08-05 | |
![]() WITH a swipe at American âimperialismâ and reports on social problems in Latin America, a new regional television channel began pilot transmissions on July 24th. Telesur, backed by the governments of Argentina, Cuba, Uruguay and Venezuela, bills itself as a home-grown answer to CNN that will let Latin Americans see themselves âthrough their own eyesâ. But 70% of the channel's $10m start-up cost comes from Venezuela's government. To many, Telesur looks like propaganda for Hugo Chávez, Venezuela's president, and his âBolivarianâ revolution, named for South America's independence hero but of increasingly Predictably enough, at the urging of Connie Mack, a Florida Republican, the United States' House of Representatives greeted Telesur by approving an amendment to the Foreign Appropriations Act calling for rival propaganda broadcasts. That allowed Mr Chávez to gloat that by getting his channel on air he had âscored the first goalâ against George Bush. Telesur comes on the heels of other initiatives in which Mr Chávez is using some of his country's windfall oil revenues to procure friends and influence abroad, especially in Latin America. Thus, Venezuela has bought $538m of Argentine debt. It is talking about doing the same for Ecuador's new populist government. Venezuela has also promised to build houses in Cuba and to finance co-operatives in Argentina. | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#9 Pretty easy to understand if you weren't thinking in a linerar 1990 SEC Fashion. Joesph M. ain't talking about Auburn, this is like RealPolitik, I'm gonna call it RealFootaball. Come to Columbia and buy a visor. |
Posted by: The Ole Ball Coach 2005-08-05 16:32 |
#8 We've learned not to ask... |
Posted by: tu3031 2005-08-05 11:48 |
#7 If you don't understand then you must be SEC. |
Posted by: Pappa 2005-08-05 11:46 |
#6 What the hell does Penn State have to do with Chavez, Venezuela, or this article? |
Posted by: Mitch H. 2005-08-05 11:45 |
#5 If pouring money down the sinkhole that is Cuba constitutes a diplomatic victory for Senor Chavez, we should encourage many more such triumphs for him. Just because you don't believe in profit/loss statements doesn't mean you aren't rocketing to bankruptcy. Once oil drops below $40/barrel, Hugo will be hanging from the nearest lamp post. |
Posted by: Dreadnought 2005-08-05 10:22 |
#4 Let 'em rot or ripen, who cares? They will all turn on us, especially the Mexicans. So just keep some one covering the 6. |
Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2005-08-05 10:12 |
#3 EY: But nonetheless, what do you all deem better - letting them rot away internally, or taking a wrecking ball to the problem and hoping that gringo-hating (I'm a banana, but would they know the difference or care?) doesn't actually slow the rot? To Latin Americans, *all* Americans are gringos, including the diplomats of Hispanic descent that we send out there. |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2005-08-05 09:38 |
#2 LOL, the first post where Joseph Mendiola didn't use mostly capital-letters! But nonetheless, what do you all deem better - letting them rot away internally, or taking a wrecking ball to the problem and hoping that gringo-hating (I'm a banana, but would they know the difference or care?) doesn't actually slow the rot? |
Posted by: Edward Yee 2005-08-05 09:14 |
#1 Hugo, Hugo, Hugo - what will Chelsea Clinton, Shannon, and Penn State, etc. say iff they knew!? Hugey, Hugey, don'y let another Marriot betray its bananas? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2005-08-05 01:37 |