| Submit your comments on this article |
| Moderator Note |
| 2005-08-04 |
| I deleted the post on RU-486. No complaints against anyone specifically, but it's problematic for Rantburg: 1) it really has nothing to do with the WoT 2) we'll get all the pro-abortion and anti-abortion crazies coming here. Think of Boris only less willing to compromise. Remember, the 'Burg is for the WoT, politix, economics and tech stuff related to that, and the usual weird animal stories. Thanks. |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #12 But we can post about the Ru-Pentium still, right? (I won't repeat the joke since everyone's heard it.) |
| Posted by: Jackal 2005-08-04 23:01 |
| #11 Good move. |
| Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2005-08-04 21:46 |
| #10 I'm as vigorous a pro-lifer as they come, so I would count as one of those "anti-abortion crazies" that would stoke the fires by refusing to act like a crazy. However, I'm too enamored with the idea of arguing my points using proper logic to hypocritically break the rules of a board like Rantburg by submitting off-topic posts. Thus, although my curiosity is piqued, I understand Steve's motivations, and applaud the tone and content of this note. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2005-08-04 21:41 |
| #9 I'd rather concentrate on U-235. That's a much more dangerous "morning after". Unfortunately, too many nutjobs see it as an "equalizer". All it "equalizes" is destruction. |
| Posted by: Old Patriot 2005-08-04 19:46 |
| #8 I remember when they were boycotting Intel over the RU-486 chip. |
| Posted by: Eric Jablow 2005-08-04 19:33 |
| #7 aborted the ru486 article? Poor thing wasn't wanted. |
| Posted by: 2b 2005-08-04 15:49 |
| #6 Think of Boris only less willing to compromise. Speaking of RU-486....... |
| Posted by: Shipman 2005-08-04 15:18 |
| #5 Let us talk about U-238 instead. |
| Posted by: mmurray821 2005-08-04 15:01 |
| #4 Thanks for the discretion exercised. |
| Posted by: MunkarKat 2005-08-04 14:28 |
| #3 Let us not forget Illudium Q36. |
| Posted by: Steve 2005-08-04 14:23 |
| #2 Its got my vote and support |
| Posted by: Cheaderhead 2005-08-04 14:20 |
| #1 What about RU-469? |
| Posted by: BH 2005-08-04 14:18 |