You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
U.S. and China Unite to Block G4 Plan
2005-08-04
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States and China have agreed to work together to block a plan to expand the powerful U.N. Security Council, China's U.N. ambassador said Wednesday.

Ambassador Wang Guangya said he reached the agreement with John Bolton during a meeting Tuesday, which was the new U.S. ambassador's first full day in his new post, because both believe the proposal by Brazil, Germany, India and Japan would divide the U.N.'s 191 member states.
Wouldn't want to disrupt the peace and unity that exists now ...
Washington and Beijing are already on record as opposing the so-called Group of Four resolution for different reasons, but the agreement would mark a new joint effort to prevent its approval by the U.N. General Assembly, which requires a two-thirds ``yes'' vote.

Wang and Bolton, who have known each other for about 15 years, met again Wednesday outside the office of General Assembly President Jean Ping, part of a round of courtesy calls the U.S. envoy is making to Security Council members and senior U.N. officials. ``There's a lot of important work,'' Bolton said. ``It's a very busy schedule in the first couple of days, and I think it's been productive and I'm certainly enjoying myself.''
He said with a Darth Vader laugh ...
Wang said the ultimate objective of China and the United States is to expand the Security Council with a formula that is not divisive. ``But at this stage, I think our objective will be to oppose the G-4, to make sure they do not have sufficient votes to take the risk to divide the house,'' he said.

``We agreed to work together to make sure that our interests are being maintained - which means that we have to work in parallel ways to see that the unity of the U.N. members, the unity of every regional group, will not be spoiled because of this maneuver and process,'' Wang said. But he said Washington and Beijing will be working in parallel in the coming weeks to block the resolution - not together - because ``we have different friends in different parts of the world.''
True 'nuff, our friends are the democracies, and theirs ...
The U.S.-China effort to defeat the Group of Four comes on the eve of Thursday's emergency summit called by the African Union to consider whether to approve a compromise agreement which some of its ministers reached with Brazil, Germany, India and Japan in London on July 25.

Brazil, Germany, India and Japan have introduced a resolution calling for a 25-member council that would add six permanent seats without a veto and four nonpermanent seats. They are hoping to win four of the permanent seats with the other two earmarked for Africa. South Africa, Nigeria and Egypt are the leading African contenders. The African Union has proposed expanding the council to 26 members - adding six permanent seats with veto power and five non-permanent seats. A third resolution by a group called Uniting for Consensus would add 10 non-permanent seats.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Refer to above-mentioned post on premature female ejaculation
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-04 15:24  

#5  smn, when you upgrade your foil chapeau, be sure the aluminum meets all EU standards for anti-alien-mind-control beam reflection.

(also be sure you use enough !!!s - otherwise the CIA might tap into this with their telepathic clones of Karl Rove and Dick Cheney)
Posted by: leader of the pack   2005-08-04 07:14  

#4  You said it mac!! I agree.
Posted by: smn   2005-08-04 05:21  

#3  Pigs will fly before anyplace in Africa deserves a seat on the Security Council. There isn't one decently run country on the whole damned continent. Even South Africa is in a slow-motion collapse. Africans should be grateful the UN even lets their hellholes have membership in the General Assembly.
Posted by: mac   2005-08-04 04:21  

#2  A compromise move would be to make the rotating seats limited to these countries and not the vast number of other kleptocracies who suck resources rather than provide them [that is beyond corrupt UN bureaucrats].
Posted by: Omiger Snaviting1691   2005-08-04 02:11  

#1  Most odd, the US and China both agreeing on this matter; where we all know, when the eventual 'Tag' starts between the US and The Chinese...everyone else will be forced to decide which "side" to join! This is nothing but subdefuge which will work itself out when the shooting starts!!
Posted by: smn   2005-08-04 00:15  

00:00