You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Rights Group Denounces Iraqi Insurgents
2005-08-03
Armed groups in Iraq that oppose the U.S.-led coalition are committing war crimes by killing civilians, taking hostages and torturing and slaying defenseless prisoners, the human rights group Amnesty International said.
Wowzers! Even Amnesia International noticed?
The London-based organization also said it recognized that many Iraqis believe U.S.-led troops also have committed grave human rights violations. But it denounced the Iraqi insurgents for a "failure to abide by even the most basic standards of humanitarian law."
I think we've mentioned a time or two here how gleeful they are in flouting minimal standards of decency, but we're a bunch of infidels, so what the hell do we know?
"There is no honor nor heroism in blowing up people going to pray or murdering a terrified hostage. Those carrying out such acts are criminals, nothing less, whose actions undermine any claim they may have to be pursuing a legitimate cause," Amnesty said. The Amnesty International report — "In Cold Blood: Abuses by Armed Groups" — said insurgents were guilty of direct attacks intended to cause the greatest possible loss of civilian life, indiscriminate attacks resulting in the deaths of civilians, targeting humanitarian organizations, abductions and killing captured and defenseless police and military personnel. The report, released last week, said it was impossible to calculate how many civilians had died in Iraq as a result of these attacks. "We urge armed groups to immediately cease all attacks against civilians and all other abuses," Amnesty International said. "Armed groups, like other parties to the conflict in Iraq, are required to comply strictly with international law in all their acts and remain accountable for their actions."
Naturally, the AP article goes on to bitch about the U.S. standards of conduct, but you probably guessed that.
Posted by:Fred

#10  Can't go too strong - you'll alienate your potential funding base.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-08-03 21:38  

#9  The Amnesty International report — "In Cold Blood: Abuses by Armed Groups"..

"Armed groups" intentionally targeting civilians is simply "abuse"?

Sheesh.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-08-03 14:00  

#8  All in all this comes pretty close to a 10.0 on the "Drop-my-jaw-o-meter". But will it make a difference? Not f*****g likely
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2005-08-03 12:26  

#7  That's just what the islamonuts have been waiting for, I'm sure - AI's perspective on their approach. It's a spit in the ocean, and they're on the other shore.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-08-03 12:03  

#6  Glad we have the folks at AI to keep it sorted. Perhaps they could describe the role of apologists and others in supporting the commission of "war crimes" through issuing a really special report.
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-08-03 11:15  

#5  And thus they toss out a smoke screen of balance.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-08-03 09:11  

#4  "We urge armed groups to immediately cease all attacks against civilians and all other abuses," Amnesty International said.

Yeah, that should stop it. Pledge Week over at AI maybe?
Posted by: tu3031   2005-08-03 08:54  

#3  This statement is from "the London-based" not the New York-based. So don't get excited. Self defense is still a "war crime" to these people.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-08-03 05:34  

#2  I am stunned and amazed AI finally got around to mentioning the carnage and brutality.

"We urge armed groups to immediately cease all attacks against civilians and all other abuses,"

Call me sceptical, but I just don't see this having much effect on vermin who happily engage in mass slaughter. Certainly not a much as, say, a trained Marine sniper, or a pre-dawn police raid.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-08-03 05:24  

#1  What next? ACLU?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-08-03 02:34  

00:00