You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Condemnation of homicide bombing blocked by Guess Who
2005-07-28
From WND. More trustworthy than BBC or NYT, but check your NaCl supply.
Islamic United Nations representatives blocked an attempt to have the world body condemn killing in the name of religion. The International Humanist and Ethical Union said it submitted the request to the U.N. Human Rights Commission in Geneva in response to moves by Islamic clerics to legitimize the current wave of terror attacks.

IHEU representative David Littman tried to deliver a prepared text in the names of three international NGOs – the Association for World Education, the Association of World Citizens and the IHEU – but was blocked by the "heavy-handed intervention" of Islamic representatives of the panel. Littman said that after repeated interruptions, he was unable to complete his speech.

The Muslims members said they saw the text as an attack on Islam.
A condemnation of murdering innocents is an attack on Islam? So, you are admitting that Islam is based on murdering innocents? Nice to have that on the record.
The IHEU argued Littman's speech was a report on recent critical comment on Islamist extremism by a number of notable Muslim writers. The intent was for the U.N. Human Rights Commission "to condemn calls to kill, to terrorize or to use violence in the name of God or any religion."
"Nope, nope, that'll never do, nope, nope."
The text referred to recent decisions by high-ranking Muslim clerics to confirm that those who carry out suicide bombings remain Muslims and cannot be treated as apostates. A Saudi cleric, for example, issued a fatwa saying that innocent Britons were a legitimate target for terrorist action. Also, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, dean of the College of Sharia and Islamic Studies at Qatar University, who has visited Britain, said terror attacks are permissible.
Well, isn't that interesting? It took a while, but I've pretty much come to the conclusion that killing moslems is fine and dandy. If you have to kill 1,000,000 "innocent" ones to get one terrorist, I have no objection.
I'd prefer it didn't come to that, but some of these jokers are getting pretty obstinate.
Roy Brown, president of IHEU, said the censorship is "part and parcel of the refusal by the Islamic representatives at the U.N. to condemn the suicide bombers, or to accept any criticism of those who kill innocent people in the name of God."
Posted by:Thromotle Cleting5515

#5  To clarify My in-line comment, I do not we should be killing moslems simply because they are moslems. But, if it's a choice between letting a terrorist go, and killing him with the population that is sheltering him, take the shot, regardless of the number.
Posted by: Jackal   2005-07-28 22:04  

#4  FUCK the u.n., FUCK islam, gutter pedophile religion. FUCK hillary, FUCK teddyboy kennedy, FUCK allah (dicksucking god of the pedophile), FUCK muhammad, (fucking pedophile bastard). FUCK every goddamn mooselimb on earth....kill 'em all. I wipe my ass on the queeran...and piss on it's remains. FUCK kofi annan....the mooselimb son-of-a-bitch.
Posted by: Tom Dooley   2005-07-28 15:23  

#3  Another nail in the U.N. coffin.U.N.out of U.S.,U.S. out of U.N.
What do you have to say for your beloved U.N.,MS?
Posted by: raptor   2005-07-28 11:37  

#2  American Woman?
Posted by: Chris W.   2005-07-28 10:42  

#1  And a particular religion is not a big Root Cause thingy?
Posted by: MunkarKat   2005-07-28 10:24  

00:00