You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Laughing at the Left: the rise of conservative cartoons
2005-07-28
by Harry Stein, City Journal. EFL; RTWT.

Bruce Tinsley, creator of the conservative comic strip Mallard Fillmore, remembers feeling stunned when the fan letter showed up in February 1998. After all, his strip— featuring a right-leaning TV newsman or, more accurately, newsduck—was still in its relative infancy. Yet here was George Herbert Walker Bush declaring that he and Barbara turned to Mallard, “sage duck that he is,” first thing every morning. Even more gratifying, the former president thanked Tinsley for taking on “that horrible Doonesbury” and its creator, liberal icon Garry Trudeau, “a guy that tore me up in a vicious, personal way strip after strip.” . . .

The Mallard strips that prompted Bush’s letter had been a response to a series of Doonesbury strips that disdainfully characterized conservative talk radio as “hate radio.”

“Mallard Presents: Learning the Liberal Lexicon!” reads the opening panel of one of the strips. “ ‘Hate Radio,’ a common liberal word made from 2 ordinary words.” In the second panel, a bespectacled professor type explains: “ ‘Radio’—the thing we use to listen to N.P.R. in our Volvos.” “ ‘Hate,’ ” adds a dowdy aging hippie in panel three—“the word we use to describe any opinion that DISAGREES with OURS!”

“That was really terrific,” says Tinsley today of the ex-president’s appreciative letter, noting that from the start he intended Mallard to be, among other things, an antidote to Doonesbury. . . .

. . . Tinsley created the Mallard character while working for a Charlottesville, Virginia, paper in the early nineties. In the strip, the duck landed his job in a fictional Washington newsroom only because he was “Amphibious-American.” But when a new management team took over Tinsley’s real-life newsroom, he soon found himself out of work. The last straw for the new bosses was a strip that had Mallard musing about what might have happened if Michelangelo had applied for a National Endowment for the Arts grant. While the NEA would surely like all the naked people, the duck concluded, they’d also object to the depiction of God as male, worrying about its disheartening influence over little girls. The new publisher, it turned out, was on NEA’s board. Happily for Tinsley, the Washington Times swiftly picked up Mallard Fillmore, followed by King Features, which recognized that the strip could fill a gaping hole in the funnies version of the political marketplace. . . .

. . . Though Prickly City’s main characters are cuddlier than the Mallard crew—creator Scott Stantis claims Charles Schulz’s Peanuts as a key inspiration—there’s nothing soft about the strip’s politics or in the obvious delight it takes in thumbing its nose at politically correct norms.

In fact, having replaced Mallard as the resident conservative strip at the Chicago Tribune, Stantis soon watched the paper kill one of his entries, which derided Senator Ted Kennedy’s moral high-handedness at Condoleezza Rice’s confirmation hearings by making a none-too-subtle Chappaquiddick reference. Not long after, the Seattle Times refused to run a hard-hitting Prickly City series inspired by the Terri Schiavo saga. In it, the strip’s conservative protagonist, a spunky little girl named Carmen, announces that she’s depressed because her favorite team has lost in the NCAA Basketball Tournament; her best pal, a talking coyote named Winslow, decides that he’ll relieve her of her agony by starving her to death. . . .

Even as Mallard Fillmore and Prickly City alter the balance of power on the comics page, at least one right-of-center cartoonist is starting to make an impact on the web. Without the benefit of syndication or any other traditional form of promotion, Day by Day, by Chris Muir, has become a daily stop for many bloggers— a sign of how the Right remains ahead of the curve in the blogosphere. Knowing how few newspaper editors share his conservative politics, Muir flatly declares dailies are “the antithesis of what I want to get involved with.”

Heading Muir’s cast of youngish hipsters is Damon, a young, self-made black software entrepreneur, with zero patience for the standard liberal truisms about race, economics, foreign policy, or much anything else (the strip reflects Muir’s real-world experience as a Florida-based industrial designer). “Funny,” as one of Damon’s white pals remarks to him in one recent strip, “Dean says you white Christian Republican boys all look the same.” Sardonic as ever, Damon replies: “He’s just worried Rove’ll take the medical stash he’s been smokin’.” . . .

Harry Stein is the author of the delightful book How I Accidentally Joined the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy (and Found Inner Peace).
Posted by:Mike

#18  The breadth of experience and knowledge here is breath-taking and, often, quite frightening. It makes it worth every minute.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-07-28 21:42  

#17  I agree wholeheartedly w/ Mike on this one. I've said it before and I'll say it again...(like the old Marines commercial)....I learn more at RB before 10 am than I could even hope to learn from MSM (and even Fox News) in an entire week! Plus, you get the great commentary to boot (I personally am in awe of .com and Fred).
Posted by: BA   2005-07-28 21:41  

#16  The reality is the Right is much funnier than the Left. RB is a good example, but there are many others, PJ O'Rourke comes to mind. I think there is a simple reason behind it. In order to see the funny side of something you have to be able view it from different perspectives, whereas the Left peddles this uniform 2 dimentional view of the world, which precludes seeing it in different ways necessary to see the funny side.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-07-28 21:39  

#15  there's money? Frankly
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-28 21:06  

#14  Frankily, I come here for the money.
Posted by: Jack Rubenstein   2005-07-28 20:05  

#13  "I am what could easily be called poor,under-educated white trash."

So what? What matters here are not your credentials, but whether you make sense. And IIRC, you usually do. Keep commenting.
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-07-28 16:51  

#12  Hey, what about me?
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-07-28 16:49  

#11  It is amazing how many sharp minds there are here in the 'Burg: Fred, the AoS, raptor, Zhang Fei, JFM, TGA, .com, Alaska Paul, badanov, Old Spook, trailing wife, Sgt. Mom, Jarhead, 11A5S, Chuck Simmins, Frank G, Ptah, Howard UK, Bulldog, Shipman, mojo, Pappy, tu3031, the inimitable muck4doo . . . I'm leaving people out, I know it!
Posted by: Mike   2005-07-28 16:45  

#10  Raptor - Kerry's educated, but dumb - voted for the war before I voted against it, and opening himself up to the Swift Boat guys....

Teddy has economic status, and a 'liberal' education, I believe, but is relatively useless, except to show the dark side.

Here, one is valued for their thoughts, not their accomplishments, or their birth status. So keep posting good thoughts, and I'll keep reading them!
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-28 16:34  

#9  Raptor, I, too, always read your comments and enjoy your thoughts. Thanks for being here. (There are some folks I do just skip over)
Posted by: Sherry   2005-07-28 16:11  

#8  I come to rantburg primarily because the posters seem far better informed than nearly any other board I've ever seen, and a large number are pretty damn funny to boot.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-07-28 13:09  

#7  Please elaborate for me,Bobby?
(I think I might be feeling a little sorry for myself this morn,if so please ignore)
Posted by: raptor   2005-07-28 12:46  

#6  Education and economic status have nothing to do with intellect, Raptor. I've enjoyed your posts.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-28 12:24  

#5  Cox and Forkum...

COX and FORKUM!!!
Posted by: Hyper   2005-07-28 11:51  

#4  One of the primary reasons Ilove RB,Bobby,is this respect that you speak of.I am what could easily be called poor,under-educated white trash.But,while sometimes my opinons,comments and thoughts are often rediculed as assinine(something I have no problem addmitting to when my stupidity is pointed out,and valid reasons are given)over-all I am given a great deal of respect here at RB that is not given to me at Liberial sites.
Thank you RB'ers one and all.
Posted by: raptor   2005-07-28 09:59  

#3  day by day is an daily stop for me.
Posted by: raptor   2005-07-28 09:38  

#2  As it happens, the same holds true for Mallard creator Tinsley, whose wife is a civil rights lawyer. There’s perhaps a lesson here. “It’s a funny thing,” Tinsley says. “All her liberal friends are incredulous that our marriage works, but none of my conservative friends have any trouble with it at all. They understand you can think differently about things and still be civil to one another.”

Almost immediately, this observation leads Tinsley to reflect on something else. “You ever notice how often liberals seem to think that, because they hold these lofty social views, it excuses them from having to be civil to bellboys and cabdrivers? I really think that by and large conservatives are just much nicer.”


That's why RB - for civil, well-reasoned discourse - has more conservative folks who visit here.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-28 08:23  

#1  How observant - "I mean, the crudity and intolerance of the Left these days is unbelievable; I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been called a Nazi. But that’s what happens when you don’t have any ideas and the only thing left is anger.”
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-28 08:17  

00:00