You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
US can keep Kyrgyzstan air base
2005-07-26
The US has been told it can keep its airbase in Kyrgyzstan as long as it is needed for operations in Afghanistan. But the Kyrgyz defence minister said that once the situation improved, US forces would no longer need to stay on. US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is on a tour of Central Asia - a trip said to be in response to pressure on the US to withdraw from bases in the region.
I guess the Donald used his famed mind control technique.
About 1,000 US soldiers are stationed in Kyrgyzstan, and the US also has an airbase in neighbouring Uzbekistan. These bases are a vital hub for ferrying supplies to US forces in Afghanistan, and providing refuelling services for US aircraft.

The Pentagon negotiated the use of airfields in Central Asia four years ago, to support the war in Afghanistan. The move extended American influence deep into the territory of the former Soviet Union. But the Pentagon was caught off guard when earlier this month four Central Asian states, backed by Russia and China, issued a joint call for the US to clarify its intentions. They said the situation in Afghanistan was now stabilising and the US should give a timetable for its withdrawal. These calls are thought to have prompted Mr Rumsfeld to make his short-notice trip to the region - and his visit appears to have secured the US presence in the region, at least for the time being.

"The [US] base at Manas will stay as long as the situation in Afghanistan requires," said Kyrgyz Defence Minister Ismail Isakov, during a news conference on Tuesday. Crucially for Washington, he said he agreed with the US view that the situation at present was quite far from being stable. Donald Rumsfeld appeared to view his visit as a success. "I wouldn't pack your bags," he told US forces at the Manas base. But, whether America manages to maintain a longer-term military presence in Central Asia is still not certain, according to BBC correspondent Damian Grammaticas.

The recent pressure on the US to withdraw is said to have been prompted by recent instability in Central Asia. In the past few months, protests swept Kyrgyzstan's president from power and Uzbekistan's authorities put down an uprising in the city of Andijan, killing - it is claimed - hundreds of civilians. Washington's rivals for regional dominance, Russia and China, have made clear they do not want to see US forces in the region on a permanent basis. They will welcome Kyrgyzstan's statement that the US stay on its territory is only a temporary one, our correspondent says.

After his meetings in Bishkek, Mr Rumsfeld flew to Tajikistan for talks with senior officials in the capital Dushanbe. While the US has no troops based in Tajikistan, it has negotiated an arrangement allowing US military aircraft to refuel and fly over Tajik territory on missions relating to Afghanistan.
Posted by:Steve

#10  That goes without saying Jarhead, that's in the Pre-deployed Airship Package.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-26 18:30  

#9  Ship, they would also need an on-board speaker system to play "Whole Lotta Love" once in the assault position - psy ops ya know.
Posted by: Jugum Thraigum4200 aka Jarhead   2005-07-26 17:54  

#8  Way cool Ed! Only thing missing from those craft is a 75 foot carbo/alumino/fullerino Needle for Zep-to-Zep combat. No AI will work for these big babdx, you need a pilot and an angry fighting crew, grapling and boarding/repelling tactics will be to be rediscovered. I have an idea that will make use of thousands of inexpensive....

Suddenly Hatfield the talking goldie sez: "Were you going to type "thousands of inexpensive robots armed with single edged razors?" That would be mean.

And the age of the Fighter Zep ends before it can begin.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-26 11:29  

#7  The Kyrgyz government wants more money. This is also a hint to the Chinese about what a bigger bribe could buy them.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-07-26 10:23  

#6  Ship,

You are truly a visionary ahead of our time. A misunderstood genius, and I feel your ambivalence. Fear me, for I am the Walrus.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-26 10:07  

#5  w/ cavitating nose cones..zzzoooommmm!
Posted by: Baron von dawg   2005-07-26 09:59  

#4  All right, someone help Me out here. Are there not enough air bases in Afghanistan? Why would we need staging bases in the other countries over there?

I can understand keeping ground detachments in places where the locals want help. But why air bases?
Posted by: Jackal   2005-07-26 09:56  

#3  After my chastisement of yestesday Ima forced to rethink things. We could build thousands of Hindenburg or larger size zepplins, but use extralite-helium instead of hydrogen for lift. Power them with thousands of solar cells and fly them above SAM altitude or use prescribed skylanes prescribed by treaty. Once over the area of interest they could land and safely unload thousands of tons of supplies, if the landing area was not safe they could drop thousand of tiny...

Suddenly Hatifield the Talking Dawg walked up to his colleague: "You were gonna type drop thousands of tiny robots with chainsaws weren't ya? That's not nice."

So our story ends inconclusively with thousands of Zepplins circling a hostile LZ.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-07-26 09:52  

#2  The Manas airbase contributes 5% of Kyrgyzstan's GDP. It's about the only source of high paying, non-graft jobs in the country. Who wants to bet that that it's payroll is filled with the sons and daughters of Kyrgyz officials, and PhDs are happy to work as electricians and cooks on the base.
Posted by: ed   2005-07-26 09:51  

#1  Ok, I'll say it.

All your base are belong to us!
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-07-26 09:20  

00:00