You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Japan approves new missile rules
2005-07-22
Japan has passed legislation that allows the defence chief to order the interception of incoming missiles without seeking Cabinet permission. The bill was approved by the upper house in a 126-94 vote, and will now be made law. It was passed in the more powerful lower house last month.

Correspondents say there are concerns that the present system would waste time in the event of an attack. Japan's pacifist constitution renounces using force in international disputes. Japan's government has been reconsidering its defence policy, amid concern about the nuclear ambitions of its neighbour North Korea. Japan is due to take part in six-nation nuclear talks with the Stalinist state next week in Beijing.

Under the new law, missiles can be launched without permission of the prime minister or the Cabinet only in an emergency. If the situation is not urgent, defence personnel will continue to follow current procedures.
I think a incoming missile would qualify as "urgent"
Supporters of the bill argued that the legislation was needed to respond quickly to an attack. "If a missile comes flying into Japan, we have to shoot it down to protect the lives and property of the Japanese people before we can mobilise our defences," Defence Agency chief Yoshinori Ono told reporters.

But critics are concerned the legislation will give Japan's military too much power. They also fear the country's pacifist policy, in place since World War II, will be threatened. Japan has been undergoing a review of its defence policy, and last year it eased restrictions on arms exports to allow greater collaboration with the US in areas of missile defence. Tokyo says a review is necessary due to the world's changing security situation.
Posted by:Steve

#11  ;-) touche
Posted by: Frank G   2005-07-22 18:53  

#10  Actually 81. Kerry voted against it before he voted for it. You could look it up.
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-07-22 18:50  

#9  Or rather, 82, in non-ID10t math.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-07-22 17:47  

#8  Looks like we've got 72 to go. ;)
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-07-22 17:46  

#7  Byrd, Snowe, Dayton
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-07-22 16:37  

#6  Dodd, Chaffee, Specter...
Posted by: Pappy   2005-07-22 16:19  

#5  Kerry, Durbin, Scheumer ...
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-22 16:13  

#4  Kennedy, Pelosi, Boxer...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-07-22 11:01  

#3  Who are the 94 dolts that voted against shooting at a missile headed toward their country?
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2005-07-22 10:59  

#2  It's interesting to examine the psychology of those opposed to this bill. Ignore their stated reason and look a little deeper. They have the bizarre idea that if they are "victims", then they won't need to defend themselves. By being utterly helpless, whoever would attack them, wouldn't. Like puppies rolling over on their backs to show submission to adult dogs. Not what I would call a highly effective technique.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-07-22 10:27  

#1  Tokyo says a review is necessary due to the world's changing security situation.

Yes it is. Japan has proven it can now be trusted as a normal country on the international stage and doesn't need the US holding its hand for defense anymore. Let them be a normal country.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-07-22 10:08  

00:00