You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
What happened to unconditional surrender?
2005-07-20
by Cal Thomas

DOLGELLAU, Wales - Thank goodness for those history channels that bring back the generals and politicians of the past who, by contrast, make many of today's leaders look indecisive. I saw President Harry Truman on one of them last week. In a speech to the nation near the end of World War II, Truman rejected suggestions that the Allies seek accommodation with Japan, rather than victory. Truman would have none of it, saying only Japan's "unconditional surrender" would be acceptable.

Contrast that with the conciliatory blather of today. Prime Minister Tony Blair is inviting British and Muslim leaders to a meeting Tuesday at 10 Downing Street where it is reported he will urge worldwide action to uproot what he has called the "evil ideology" and "twisted teaching" that lay behind the London bombings. Here's what Blair should say to the Muslim leaders: "The onus is on you guys. You find and shut down the terrorists and their network. You turn those who incite, plan and encourage violence over to the authorities. If you don't act, we will by closing and bulldozing the mosques and schools that incubate and instruct the killers, prosecuting the terrorists we find and deporting them and their clerics, and closing our borders to anyone from countries that harbor and teach terrorists. Those who are British citizens will be stripped of their citizenship."

As part of its continuing disinformation campaign in America (reminiscent of Nazi, Soviet and Japanese propaganda of the not-too-distant past), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is providing public service announcements to American television stations titled "Not in the Name of Islam." A CAIR press release says the spots are designed to "highlight the Muslim community's condemnation of terrorism and rejection of those who carry out terror attacks."

Just who are these spots designed to influence? Does CAIR wish us to believe the jihadists in America will see them and convert to democratic ideals, or is this Tokyo Rose propaganda designed to keep our guard down? It is helpful to quote what two prominent senators have said about CAIR: "(CAIR is) unusual in its extreme rhetoric and its associations with groups that are suspect," said Richard Durbin, Illinois Democrat. "We know (CAIR) has ties to terrorism," added Charles Schumer, New York Democrat.

The problem with the cluttered Western contemporary mind is there is little room for anyone or any philosophy based on absolutes and convictions. The terrorists benefit from Western self-indulgence, ignorance about history and aversion to war. If we think of depravity at all, it is in the Michael Jackson vein and not religious fanatics, who kill school children, behead "infidels" and seek world domination. Western secularists cannot comprehend people who link their private faith to public actions. Too many think terrorists can be dissuaded from their bloody goals by using Western logic and trying to "understand why they hate us." I don't want to understand why they hate us, anymore than my father's generation sought to understand Nazis, or the ideological slaves of Hirohito. Like that generation, since the jihadists have declared war on us, I want to kill them before they kill me.

To make us feel better and allow us to "get on with our lives," we make believe the jihadists are a tiny minority and not "mainstream Islam." But what if they are mainstream - part of an elaborate conspiracy designed to dupe the West while the infiltration of Britain, America and all of Europe continues unabated?

What if the "moderates" are too intimidated to speak out for fear they will be killed? If that is the case, it is all the more reason to declare total war on the jihadists, because that is what they have declared on us. Would it not be a clever strategy to put insurgents among us who dress and speak as Westerners, work in our schools and restaurants (as one of the bombing suspects did in London), but are secretly plotting the death of total strangers? They know they don't have the power of a conquering army to defeat us from without, but they believe the virus they are spreading can weaken us from within until we surrender because we favor "peace" over conflict.

Wake up, America and Britain! The jihadists are after us and they will stop at nothing until we all live under the banner of Islam, either by fear or by force.

Where have you gone, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill? Our nations turn their lonely eyes to you. Boo-hoo-hoo.
Posted by:ed

#5  Many in America play the game that what has happened (911) is somehow our fault. There are those in Great Britain that think the same way. We have been in a war with the jihadists long before 911. The jihadists have our destruction at the heart of their beliefs. However, look what happened when Congressman Tom Tacredo said we should bomb Mecca and Medina should a 911 like event occur. Just about everyone denounced and distance themselves from him and his remarks. There is so much crap being passed off as critical thinking. The MSM is a party to this propaganda. I hope it is not too late to save the country. Cal Thomas seems to have his eye on the ball. It may get to unconditional surrender or else.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen   2005-07-20 18:14  

#4  I agree. This war may very well prove to be one that NEEDS to be fought to an unconditional surrender. If the lefties have their way, it will be. I truly do believe that America is starting to wake up to the trouble in its midst, but, unfortunately, I also think it'll take another attack or two before the gloves truly come off.
Posted by: BA   2005-07-20 14:46  

#3   that has threatened to launch “a bloody war” on the capitals of European countries that do not remove their troops from Iraq within a month.

Abu Hafs al Masri Brigades, an al-Qaeda group that claimed responsibility for the London bombings, has this message for the rest of Europe:
"We assure to you that we are men who adore death as much as you love life. Jihad for God’s sake will go on until the end of days, to defeat the infidels, the dictators, and their followers everywhere."

The Aztecs adored death too.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2005-07-20 12:39  

#2  Tony Blair, while a ally in the war on terror, is a flaming liberal and a "multilateralist". I think Kalle is right, we as a society are beginning to see the threats from islam, communist china and immigrant hordes. The dune loons have waged all-out war on us, we have responded somewhat casually, when we decide to annihilate them I think we could do it in short order.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2005-07-20 12:28  

#1  We're getting there. It may take another five years, but eventually a majority of Westerners will know what drives the Moslems: our submission to their death cult.

I'm still waiting for the British ultimatum to Pakistan. Tony Blair speaks well, but does he have the courage and sense of justice President Bush has demonstrated? did he go to the bombed bus and train carriages to promise death to those who supported and organised the attacks?
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2005-07-20 12:02  

00:00