You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
American Arrested at Victoria Ferry Dock with Pipe Bomb
2005-07-15
EFL A 39-year-old U.S. man, travelling with his daughter, has been charged with possessing an explosive device after allegedly carrying a homemade pipe bomb in his truck on a ferry to Victoria from Port Angeles, Washington.

Canada Border Services Agency officers examined his truck and found a suspicious device in the glove box – a 7Âœ-centimetre brass pipe that was capped on each end and had a 15-centimetre green fuse-like string glued to one end.

The man, who lives in the Seattle suburb of Issaquah, was to appear in court in Victoria on Wednesday afternoon .
Posted by:trailing wife

#7  Maybe he's a hillbilly that was sick of wasting American mailboxes and was headed crossborder for a touch of strange.
Posted by: Super Hose   2005-07-15 13:02  

#6  Mebbe it was 7.5 millimeters, just over 1/4", instead of 7.5 centimeters - or 3". 75 mm was the size of a Sherman tank shell.

Durn metric system!

Sloppy reporters!
Posted by: Bobby   2005-07-15 11:31  

#5  Update:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/232751_pipebomb15.html

"Corp. Tom Seaman of the Mounties said the device was the size of a small pen, too small to be a threat to the ferry or any building."
Posted by: Neutron Tom   2005-07-15 10:25  

#4  Someday, in Canada, they won't have to use a separate dock but will be allowed to use the same dock as everyone else.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2005-07-15 09:40  

#3  At least he was headed to Canada.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2005-07-15 08:47  

#2  Be he ELF goon, "good lad", caliphate dreamer, or McVeigh junior, he's definitely an idiot and for that alone he deserves a good legal smack.
Posted by: Tkat   2005-07-15 08:42  

#1  since they didn't give his name, I guess we can assume ...
Posted by: 2b   2005-07-15 08:27  

00:00