You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Moral Debate: Procedure Risks Making Monkeys More Humanlike
2005-07-14
Image hosted by Photobucket.com

The insertion of human stem cells into monkey brains runs a "real risk" of altering the animals' abilities in ways that might make them morally more like us, scientists said today.

A panel of 22 experts -- including primatologists, stem cell researchers, lawyers and philosophers -- debated the possible consequences of the technique for more than a year.

While the group agrees it is "unlikely that grafting human stem cells into the brains of non-human primates would alter the animals' abilities in morally relevant ways," the members "also felt strongly that the risk of doing so is real and too ethically important to ignore."

In the case of Alzheimer's research, for example, grafting human stem cells into a monkey brain would be designed to reinstate lost memory function, but "we cannot be certain that this will be the only functional result," the report concludes.

There was "considerable controversy" within the group, which disagreed on whether such experiements, some already underway, should proceed.

{SNIP}
Posted by:BigEd

#6  Anonymoose, you are desribing an ape (a primate), albeit some monkeys do have some of the traits.

Baboons have been used in ancient Egypt as temple slaves, because they gave themselves well to training for menial tasks that still required some intelligence, though.

Of course, it's not only monkeys/apes that have some abilities formerly attributable to humans only. Google "Alex parrot" to get some idea about how the boundary between human abilities and non-human ones (beside primates) is pretty fuzzy to say the least.



Posted by: Sobiesky   2005-07-14 22:24  

#5  POTA Rules! IT'S beginning!
Posted by: borgboy   2005-07-14 17:01  

#4  'moose:

Is that any less human than an austistic child?

Well, my son goes to pre-school with one. She wanders about the preschool playground singing to herself. My son calmly says to me, "Oh. That's Isabel...."

She has no attention span... Some of the monkeys do... That's what makes this spooky, though your analogy is well taken...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-07-14 16:49  

#3  No Monkey ever called me Infidel!
Posted by: Abu Clay   2005-07-14 16:13  

#2  ...Making Monkeys More Humanlike

That is an insult to monkeys.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-07-14 16:11  

#1  Dr Moreau would have had it so much easier today. Research ethics have been replaced with "trial hoping for error" that results in something grotesque. In that monkey testing is legal, but human testing is not, yet they share 99.9% of their DNA; is it legal to own a creature that is 99.95% human and .05% monkey? 99.99%? Remember that the commonly believed "distinguishing characteristic" of "human intelligence" does not exist as an objective criteria. Right now, we know that a monkey may develop a vocabulary of over 1000 words, posess a significant long-term memory, show aptitude at learning and using tools, and can even speak in sign language. Is that any less human than an austistic child?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-07-14 16:10  

00:00