You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Inuit to file anti-U.S. climate petition
2005-06-15
OSLO (Reuters) - Inuit hunters threatened by a melting of the Arctic ice plan to file a petition accusing Washington of violating their human rights by fueling global warming, an Inuit leader said Wednesday. Sheila Watt-Cloutier, chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC), also said Washington was hindering work to follow up a 2004 report by 250 scientists that said the thaw could make the Arctic Ocean ice-free in summer by 2100.
Creating a lot of new beach front property to be developed by Haliburton Condos, Inc.
Watt-Cloutier, in Oslo to receive an environmental prize, said the Inuits' planned petition to the 34-member Organization of American States (OAS) could put pressure on the United States to do more to cut industrial emissions of heat-trapping gases. "It's still in the works, the drafting is still going on," she said of a long-planned petition to the OAS' human rights arm, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. She said the Inuit aimed to file it before a U.N. meeting in Montreal in December. The OAS represents 34 nations in the Americas, from Chile to Canada, promoting cooperation and common interests. Its Inter-American Commission on Human Rights analyzes and investigates petitions which allege human rights violations. It has no power to sanction the United States but it could issue a report agreeing with the Inuit. The Inuit hope that the commission will agree that climate change is tantamount to a U.S. abuse of their human rights by thinning the ice on which hunters depend and by threatening species ranging from polar bears to seals.
Ice is a human right? Now, if it's used to cool beer.....
Watt-Cloutier said that Washington, the world's top polluter, was doing too little to limit emissions of carbon dioxide from factories, cars and power plants that are widely blamed by scientists for driving up temperatures. Washington says it is investing heavily in energy research and clean hydrogen fuel but has not joined almost all its allies in signing up for the United Nations' Kyoto protocol, which sets caps on carbon dioxide emissions. U.N. studies forecast that global warming could bring more extreme weather with disastrous droughts, floods and storms. It could also melt icecaps and drive up sea levels, swamping coastal areas and low-lying islands drowning kittens and baby chicks. The Inuit total about 155,000 people in Canada, Alaska, Greenland and Russia. The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the globe because water or bare earth, once uncovered, soak up more heat than ice or snow. Watt-Cloutier collected the $100,000 Sophie Prize on Wednesday for her work for Inuit rights. The prize is named after "Sophie's World," a teenagers' guide to philosophy that was a 1990s bestseller written by Norwegian author Jostein Gaarder. She said she would use the prize to help write a book about the Inuit to be entitled: "The Right to be Cold."
You want us to stop Global Warming? Fine, here's a solution: Nuclear winter. That work for you?
Posted by:Steve

#15  Not to repeat myself, SH, but is fundraising (again, lol) involved, perhaps?

;-)
Posted by: .com   2005-06-15 21:50  

#14  Britt Hume pointed out that Rueters covers this same story every year as Sheila Watt-Cloutier seems to have made leveling this claim an annual event.
Posted by: Super Hose   2005-06-15 21:45  

#13  Damn Ima (to steal a phrase) conflicted DB. I'll go with killing little furry animals.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-06-15 19:54  

#12  It certainly shifts the dirty work to the Indians, Paks, et al, which run the dirtiest ops....smart? Mischievous and antiamerican
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-15 19:18  

#11  Kyoto has only one objective which is to decrease emssions of greenhouse gases

and also, as Eurocrats have admitted, to "level the playing field" so that American companies are not as competitive as currently. It's not even an open secret anymore - it's a quote.
Posted by: too true   2005-06-15 18:49  

#10  Most of our allies are failing to meet their (Kyoto) emission quotas. Kyoto has only one objective which is to decrease emssions of greenhouse gases and has a single mechanism for this which is to decrease consumption of fossil fuels. In fact fossil fuel consumption is rising in all regions of the world as a another thread
makes clear. Kyoto is an abject failure and in all likelyhood exacerbating the problem by simultaneously increasing fossil fuel consumption while decreasing economic growth. The worst of both worlds. They should be suing the UN.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-06-15 18:36  

#9   In Europe, the Roman Warming lasted from 200 B.C. to A.D. 600. It allowed grapes and olives to be grown farther north, and good rains allowed the Romans to buy abundant grain from across the Mediterranean in North Africa. The Roman Warming was followed by the cold Dark Ages (A.D. 600 to 950). Weather is far less stable during the cold phases of the climate cycle. Widespread droughts and storms drove hordes of hungry barbarians to assault the granaries of the collapsing Roman Empire.

The Medieval Warming prevailed from about A.D. 950 to 1300, bringing ample sunshine, milder storms and longer growing seasons. Food harvests were so good that Britain’s population rose from an estimated 1.4 million people in the late 11th century to 5 million in 1300. Europe’s total population increased from 40 million to 60 million — during a period when temperatures rose higher than today’s.

From 1300 to 1850, the planet shifted into the Little Ice Age. The good weather ended abruptly. During the summer of 1315, incessant sheets of rain fell from May to August throughout Europe, washing away much of the topsoil and beating crops to the ground. In late summer, the weather turned unseasonably cold, and the soft kernels of the few surviving grain plants were attacked by fungus. Across northern Europe, harvests were disastrous, and famine set in.
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba516/
Posted by: Chalcas   2005-06-15 18:04  

#8  I was talking mostly of the Koyto not being enforced while people whine about us not being a part of it. Clinton did sign it, but it was never ratified by the senate and thus never went into effect.
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-15 17:35  

#7  mmurray821 - gotta disagree with you on bullshit point #2. She's right that we didn't sign Kyoto. That's all they want. A signature. Living up to the stupid thing is a whole 'nuther thing.

It's all in the nuance, baby! ;)
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-06-15 17:07  

#6  Inuit?

Oh, you mean Esqimau.

Lotsa luck, boys. Don't bend over near the French...
Posted by: mojo   2005-06-15 17:03  

#5  ...also said Washington was hindering work to follow up a 2004 report by 250 scientists that said the thaw could make the Arctic Ocean ice-free in summer by 2100.

Sounds like they might want to switch to fishing.
You're welcome...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-06-15 16:37  

#4  Watt-Cloutier said that Washington, the world's top polluter
Bullshit point #1. China and soon to be India are the world's top polluters. China actually has a brown cloud that reaches the US in the hight of summer. Can we sue China?

...not joined almost all its allies in signing up for the United Nations' Kyoto protocol, which sets caps on carbon dioxide emissions.
Bullshit point #2: Most of our allies are failing to meet their emission quotas.

U.N. studies forecast that global warming could bring more extreme weather with disastrous droughts, floods and storms.
Bullshit point #3: U.N. studies have been shown to be highly flawed and use the pollutant data from the 1970s and assume the world population will rise to 20 billion, when in fact the world's population trends most likely will top out at 12 billion, then decline.

It (global warming) could also melt icecaps and drive up sea levels, swamping coastal areas and low-lying islands
Bullshit point #4: Common sense science which is often ignored ... sadly by sciencetits. Fill up a glass with ice cubes and then put water into the top. Does the water overflow the glass when the ice melts? No. Frozen water takes up more space than liquid water. Frozen water in liquid water displaces the liquid. Most of the ice caps are floating on water. The levels of the oceans would not change much, only the ice on land would add to the sea levels and their isn't much of that. (I think I saw this on junkscience.com)
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-06-15 15:47  

#3  Hoo boy. What a dilemma.

Save the ice so people can hunt. Climate change v. shooting the cuddly animals.

Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-06-15 14:58  

#2  You have "The Right to be Cold."
You don't have the right to snowmobiles, electricty, central heating, rifles, modern medicine, airtravel, and computers to type your silly manuscripts. Go native Sheila and come talk to us again in 10 years.
Posted by: ed   2005-06-15 14:53  

#1  I'd love to see them in front of a jury, explaining how a rise from -25F to -20F (or whatever) threatens to melt the ice caps...
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-06-15 14:27  

00:00