You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
New Hicks lawyer finds hope in US comments
2005-06-11
David Hicks' new lawyer hopes the latest comments from the US Government could lead to negotiations to return David Hicks to Australia. David McLeod will fly to Cuba today to meet his client for the first time. Mr McLeod says the meeting is particularly important now the US administration has announced it would prefer detainees to be released to their countries of origin to be tried and jailed at home. However, he has told ABC Radio's AM that the fact that David Hicks is one of only four detainees facing charges, will undoubtedly complicate the case for bringing him home. "The ideal situation is for David to be simply released into Australian custody and brought home to Australia and liberated - that's the high watermark," he said.
I'd say the ideal situation would be for David to get a paper cut while abusing his koran, get sepsis, and die. But maybe that's just me...
"The low watermark would be for David to be returned to Australia for trial."
The low watermark is where we tie him to a stake.
Poor, misunderstood David was captured in Afghanistan, fighting with al-Qaeda, a few days after Johnny Jihad was rooted out at Qala i-Jangi.
Mr McLeod says concern from some US politicians over the lengthy legal process Hicks is going through may help his client's case. "I think we're still to come into the home term, we're in this for the long haul, David knows that," he said. "Unfortunately it's gone longer that anyone had hoped or anticipated."
Not nearly as long as I'd hoped or anticipated. Of course, they could have just shot him and saved us all the tedium of watching the apologists try to get him sprung.
He says similar concerns are being expressed in Australia. "It's as well to note that there has been some discussion from Australian authorities that they also are becoming concerned and it's obviously that tack that we would like to pursue with the Australian authorities upon my return," he said.
Posted by:Spavirt Pheng6042

#6  The low watermark is where we tie him to a stake.

May I recommend this nice muddly little place in the Bay of Fundy? Be sure to anchor that stake with some BIG rocks, though. Wouldn't want it pulling out when the tide comes in - sh$$ floats.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-06-11 20:58  

#5  One problem, Dave. You swim home.
We'll tell them to be looking out for you in Panama.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-06-11 18:22  

#4  and the only reason they'll bitch about is that it's a minor arrow in the quiver against W. They don't give a F&*k about Hicks. Nobody should
Posted by: Frank G   2005-06-11 18:03  

#3  His lawyer is pissing in the wind. The only "concern from some US politicians over the lengthy legal process Hicks" is coming from a few left wing democrats. In order for that route to bear fruit, the Democrats would have to retake the House, Senate, and White House. I doubt the ANY serious Senatorial or Presendential candidate will take up the banner of freeing prisnoers from gitmo. It would be like commiting political suicide.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-06-11 16:49  

#2  We don't want him and I doubt he has broken any laws of significance here.

That's the weird part I don't get. What would Australia try him for (such as what crime did he commit on Australian soil?)? He should have been dropped on the battlefield and left there as food for the buzzards.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-06-11 02:59  

#1  Don't return him to Australia. We don't want him and I doubt he has broken any laws of significance here. Send him to Afghanistan. I am sure they can find a suitable place to house him for say 20 years.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-06-11 02:27  

00:00