| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq-Jordan |
| Life Style Issues Weaken al Qaeda |
| 2005-06-01 |
| June 1, 2005: American troops operating along the Syrian border find that most of the hostiles they encounter, and kill, are foreigners. Saudi Arabians are the most common, but there are men from as far away as Morocco. The anti-government forces are increasingly non-Iraqi forces. Iraq is being invaded by hostile foreigners, who kill hundreds of Iraqis a month. The invaders speak Arabic and say they come in the name of peace. After Fallujah was cleaned out last November, Islamic terrorists and Baath Party nationalists fled to many other locations. There was no longer one large concentration of bad guys, but many smaller ones. This caused friction, because part of the al Qaeda package is severe life-style adjustments. The women have to cover up, no Western clothing, music or booze, lots of facial hair on the guys, and so on. This was not popular in Afghanistan, nor is it here. Al Qaeda enforcers will remonstrate, beat, kidnap or kill those who continually disobey. This has led to attacks on tribal leaders who disagree with al Qaeda, and refuse to buckle under to their rules. Some tribal leaders have been beaten, kidnapped or killed. The tribes have responded with violence. Throughout May, American troops in western Iraq encountered battles between Sunni Arab tribesmen and al Qaeda gunmen. American marines would get in touch with the local tribal leaders and offer assistance in these situations. Perhaps a few smart bombs? Overhead pictures from a UAV? Recording of al Qaeda radio conversations? Especially the ones discussing what they are going to do to the tribesmen once this impious resistance is put down. Over the weekend, Sunni Arab and Shia leaders agreed on how the new government would be run. The Sunni Arabs, or at least the majority of them, have agreed to work with the Shias, and against those Sunni Arabs who back al Qaeda and Saddam's old Baath Party. |
| Posted by:Steve |
| #3 Meanwhile, the NY Times gives us their 338th Abu Ghraib article since 3/1/2003: They're like a "hound-dog on a hambone" with AbuG. Sort of like their expose ad nauseum on Augusta prior to the 2004 Masters. Augusta is still male only even with the NYT onslaught. They are preaching to the choir of LLL types out there - their base market. No one else gives a rats ass. Same with the CIA rendition transport article. No sweat of the brow of the agency - it probably set the damn thing up anyway as a diversion from the real flights. |
| Posted by: Jack is Back! 2005-06-01 16:47 |
| #2 This astute analysis is from StrategyPage, of course. Meanwhile, the NY Times gives us their 338th Abu Ghraib article since 3/1/2003: http://tinyurl.com/8we7r |
| Posted by: thibaud (aka lex) 2005-06-01 15:44 |
| #1 Did they get a court order before they taped the Al Qaeda guys? I'm sure Amnesty or the ACLU will have their panties in a bunch if they didn't. |
| Posted by: Desert Blondie 2005-06-01 14:42 |