You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Mom Indicted for Hiring Stripper for Teen
2005-05-30
Hat tip to the Captain.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - A mother faces criminal charges after she hired a stripper to dance at her 16-year-old son's birthday party. Anette Pharris, 34, has been indicted by a grand jury on charges of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and involving a minor in obscene acts. The boy's father, the stripper and two others also face charges.
It's a family affair!
"I tried to do something special for my son," Pharris said. "It didn't harm him."
Next time just send him to Terpsboy, okay Mom?
About 10 people under the age of 18 were at the birthday party in September, including minors who were not related to the family, authorities said. Police spokesman Don Aaron said minors are not permitted in adult establishments. "A person shouldn't be allowed to circumvent that law by hiring a stripper, a lady who took all her clothes off and spent a good amount of time dancing around minors," he said.
"Dewd! Your Mom throws the best parties!"
"Yeah, I just wish she'd keep her clothes on."
"What's that dance she's doing on Billy's lap?"
Anette Pharris took photos at the party and tried to have them developed at a nearby drug store. Drug store employees notified authorities, police said.
Next time, dimwit, use a flippin' digital camera.
"Who are they to tell me what I can and can't show to my own children?" the mother said.
"And their guests, and our neighbors ..."
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Sorry, make that "the other 5 use 16".
Posted by: .com   2005-05-30 21:30  

#6  Another state that thinks it has a good handle on legislating brains and morality. It won't work. These people are OK by me. The sure as heck don't belong in jail.
Posted by: Sock Puppet 0’ Doom   2005-05-30 21:24  

#5  ROFL!

2b - If you had been offered a Chippendales dancer for your 16th, you're saying you would've declined? Lol, uh huh.

It's clear that this couple considers their 16 yr old a man. Good intentions + Zero thought = Class A Misdemeanor.

4 observations:

1) Arbitrary Age Laws are sometimes pretty silly. Magik does not happen at 18 or 21 or any other age. I left home within a month of my 16th birthday, attended HS, worked nights, and shared an apt with my 18yr old girlfriend - whose name was on the lease. We crossed state lines every time we went up to the north end of Bear Lake. Mann Act and about 6 or 7 other statutes broken every day, every trip. With ME the "victim", lol!Bullshit replaces common sense with such arbitrary laws. A little perspective can do wonders for making the system rational.

2) Were they a "prominent" family, or a wealthy family, or a politically connected / powerful family, this would've never seen the light of day. It would've been "worked out" quietly, privately. Since they are obviously not among the "social notables", they will be prosecuted. That the DA is pursuing this indicates to me th DA's just a prick. This is where the perspective and common sense should come in. They didn't. Prick.

3) Check the laws - only 2 of 8 states bordering Tennessee share it's 18 yrs old age of consent - 1 uses 17 and the other 4 use 16. Mapquest sez that 53 miles north of Nashville, in Russelville KY this would've been legal. No harm, no foul. Are the parents stupid? Yes. Are the patchwork laws insane? Yes.

4) When thinking about commenting, I Googled "tennessee" + "contributing to the delinquency of a minor", the FIRST site that comes up provided the ages I mentioned above. It isn't a state site. It isn't a site geared to the legal profession. It is a Gay information site - and its purpose is to make sure Gay adults know the law. Check out the open directory docs. I have to ask: who presents the real risk to these young men? Little Egypt shaking her titties? Or Gay adult predators? Yeah, that's a tangent I didn't expect to follow in my comments. And I didn't expect the first, of many, of the the links generated to be gay sites seeking not the protection of children, but the legal ass-coverage of predatory adults.

Had the parents not been Luddites, digital photos vs film, they might still have been bagged by someone bragging.

If they lived here, they could've dropped him off at The Pussy Ranch on Friday, picked him up on Monday, a changed man.
Posted by: .com   2005-05-30 20:45  

#4  almost as dumb as is it to hire a stripper for your son and his friends for his 16th
Posted by: 2b   2005-05-30 15:35  

#3  They could have spared themselves the embarrassment by using a digital camera and picking up a $50 inkjet photo printer. I don't print my own photos because it's cheaper (and less of a hassle) to get them done at the drugstore or via mail order. But having something like this developed at the drugstore? How dumb can you get?
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-05-30 15:34  

#2  Sarge,thanks for starting Memorial Monday off just right!!!! :)
Posted by: R   2005-05-30 11:49  

#1  Where do they grow these idiots? I could/would NEVER imagine getting a stripper for a 16-year-old. I mean the bar would be set so high what would you do for the 17th birthday, hire a hooker? Dumb move getting a disposable camera, cripes digitals are almost as cheap.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-05-30 11:17  

00:00