You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Norks heading for another famine
2005-05-26
From East Asia Intel, subscription req'd.
UN relief sources say North Korea's ration for cereals has been cut from 300 grams [10.5 ounces] to 250 grams, half the daily requirement. Economic reforms in 2002 that freed some prices and wages has brought inflation and increased unemployment worsening that country's endemic shortages.
Still the Military First policy is in place.
Two-thirds of the 23.7 million North Koreans depend on rations supplied by the government-run Public Distribution System, which in turn is largely fed by imported aid.
Norks threaten starvation, lay a guilt trip on the world. Keeps the army fed and the just-plain-joes weak and divided.
During the 1990s, 2 million North Koreans died from starvation due to natural disasters and the regime's diversion of both financial and manpower resources to the military. North Korea has the world's fifth-largest military, and is the most militarized nation in proportion to population with more than 1.2 million people in uniform. Military spending is estimated at a third of North Korea's gross domestic product.
2 million starve to death and the LLL says nothing. We are talking 2 million people!!!! As far as the GDP percentage, under Stalin, the USSR spent about 25% of the GDP on the military sector.
Some 3.8 million people in North Korea are "core recipients" of aid from the United Nations World Food Program. Another 2.7 million receive aid through other schemes. The UN agency said it may have to cut off all aid by October unless it receives new donations.
People are getting tired of enabling Kimmie's behavior.
It will halt cereal aid in June to 2.1 million North Korean primary school children, old people and poor urban residents.
Just like Saddam. He took the Oil-for-Food program, bribed his cronies and enablers, starved the children and built up his Baathist Regime. Kimmie read and implemented Saddam's Playbook™.
Washington hasn't decided whether to provide food but stressed that the decision was unrelated to the standoff over North Korea's nuclear weapons.
The trouble is that the decision affects the standoff. Give civilian food and the military is stronger for it. It is a plan of truly evil people that prey on the goodness of normal people.
Last year's 50,000 ton U.S. commitment was half that provided in 2003. Washington is concerned that relief meant for civilians is diverted to feed the military. Seoul's representatives at the recent North-South talks, resumed after Pyongyang's refusal for almost a year, were apparently unsuccessful in persuading a Pyongyang to return to the six-power talks.
Why should the Norks give in? Their brinksmanship threats are working against the SKors.
Much of the talks centered on the North's request for fertilizer pending since January. Although Seoul's public stance is that increased interactions and trade with the North will modify the Pyongyang regime, Seoul demanded official talks to discuss such aid rather than accepting food requests from the North Korean Red Cross. The urgency of the North's situation was demonstrated by South Korea recent agreement to send 50 trucks across the Demilitarized Zone, the first time fertilizer has been moved by land. A South Korean official said 10,000 tons would move that way while the remaining 190,000 tons would go by sea, still well under the half million tons Pyongyang has been requesting. At the same time, North Korea will send its cargo vessels into South Korean waters for the first time since 1984 to pick up the fertilizer augmenting a fleet of South Korean ships.
A non-compromising hard nosed attitude is what is needed. The sooner the Norks fall, the sooner the North Korean people can be rescued. But witholding food aid to people in need is an agonizing thing to decent people.
Posted by:Alaska Paul

#17  #5 two million people! sigh. It's mind boggling. How can one man be allowed to make so many so miserable?

Ask Bill Clinton.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2005-05-26 12:09  

#16  DO, most fertilizers are nitrates (ammonium nitrate being the most famous) and yes, explosives also are rich in nitrates.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-05-26 12:08  

#15  I think that it would be good to give NKorea 200,000 tons of fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) to be delivered by a fleet of Ryder trucks parked detonated at selected locations
Posted by: RWV   2005-05-26 11:03  

#14  Any Chem Engineers out there? Check me on this, but isn't the production of chemical fertilizers pretty much comparable to the production of smokeless powders, rocket fuels, and other materiel in terms of feedstocks, chemical plants, etc?

So essentially, by providing tons of fertilizer, the South Koreans are in fact subsidizing or freeing up NK production resources to be devoted to weapons production.

We need to get our folks off that peninsula and just focus on a plan to come pick up the pieces when its all over.
Posted by: DO   2005-05-26 11:01  

#13  In this article
Something for Pyongyang to chew on
Andrei Lankov suggets that reform is impossible.

The very existence of this affluent (from the North Korean point of view - not simply "affluent" but unbelievingly rich) and free country creates manifold problems for Pyongyang's leaders. If common North Koreans learned of South Korean prosperity and if they became less fearful of political persecution, nothing would stop them from behaving like East Germans did in 1990. Why on earth would they agree to live in a crumbling and destitute state if they knew that there was a prosperous and free "other Korea" just across the border?

Thus, the North Korean elite is cornered. These people do not want to tamper with the system since they are afraid it will collapse as a result of some experiments. In such a case, they have nothing to gain and everything to lose - not only their prosperity, privilege and power, but also their freedom - and in some cases even their lives. This means they have to continue with their policy, believing that their choice is "kill or be killed".

How to break this deadlock? The short answer is an amnesty. People who run the country should be granted immunity from persecution for all crimes.

Posted by: john   2005-05-26 10:55  

#12  Cold BH.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-05-26 09:43  

#11  I can see the headline now: "Local Doctor: North Koreans Peaceful, Euphoric"
Posted by: BH   2005-05-26 09:16  

#10  half a million tons of fertilizer is needed (that's about 50 pounds per person) and yet they grow virtually nothing

I'll bet most of the fertilizer ends up being used to keep the palace lawns and the miliatry parade fields green



Posted by: mhw   2005-05-26 09:13  

#9  I notice that farker Kim Jong II is well fed.

Any food we give them will only enable Kim to spend that much more on his military - at the same time he takes credit for the food we give him.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-05-26 09:05  

#8  Isn't starvation a preferable way to die if your life is miserable? At least that is what the MS and the left tells us. Not only do I think we should not help the Norks feed themselves, we need to actively deny them food and water. I can find a doctor or two to sign off on it.

That's what we want. Quality of death, right?

...

Okay, thanks. I'm off my Terry Shiavo high horse now, for today, at least.
Posted by: badanov   2005-05-26 08:20  

#7  You're right, RC. I'm so ashamed to be an American. Why, we put panties on people's jihadi's heads, but 2 million starving, that's o.k. (/sarcasm off/)
Posted by: BA   2005-05-26 08:18  

#6  So what? According to Amnesty International, the US is the world's #1 human rights abuser.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-05-26 07:55  

#5  two million people! sigh. It's mind boggling. How can one man be allowed to make so many so miserable?
Posted by: 2b   2005-05-26 06:03  

#4  Calling Amnesty International...
Posted by: Ptah   2005-05-26 05:34  

#3  Announce that we'll give them all the grain they want. But each grain will be dusted with potassium nitrate as a preservative. None of that grain would be given to the soldiers, I'd bet on it.

(For those of you not up on your chemicals, KNO3 was stirred into the cereal of boarding school boys to cool their desires. It isn't effective, but the boys -- and the North Korean troops -- weren't to know that. ;-] )
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-05-26 01:39  

#2  The skin fairly glows, in fact.
Posted by: .com   2005-05-26 01:13  

#1  Ask France for help or the un. Bush should not give them a solitary grain of rice until they give up nukes and weaponary. Hungry? Chew on a reactor rod mmm mmm U238 is good for the digestion.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-05-26 01:10  

00:00