You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Dutch Voters Seen Losing Interest in EU
2005-05-24
Are the Dutch tired of Europe? That will be the real question on June 1, when the Netherlands holds its referendum on the European constitution, just three days after a crucial vote on the charter in France. Polls show voters who reject the constitution have the edge over those likely to vote "yes," and the gap is growing. But they also show a majority either won't vote or are confused by the paperback-sized document and haven't made up their minds. "Holland is in a very inward mood. It's hiding behind the dikes," said historian Han van der Horst.

The constitution, a compilation of rules and procedures to make the 25-nation European Union easier to run after last year's historic expansion, has a wide range of detractors. Liberals worry a stronger federal structure could infringe on their tolerant attitudes toward euthanasia, soft drugs and gay marriage. Christians complain the constitution makes no mention of God. Animal rights groups object that it exempts religious rites and cultural traditions from protecting animals. Whatever the particular reason, the underlying motive seems to be discontent with Europe itself. "Dutch people are not interested in Europe," said Daniel de Jongh, a volunteer for a committee campaigning against the referendum. "People felt they never really had a chance to speak out. But with this referendum, now I can say, 'Stop. No. I don't want it.'"

The government is spending $4.4 million on last-minute campaigning, saying it is confident it can still swing the vote. Government ministers have hit the streets to pass out leaflets and talk up the constitution. Mailboxes are stuffed with pro-Europe brochures, printed at taxpayer expense. Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende even plugged the constitution during the May 8 World War II memorial attended by President Bush _ remarks many criticized as inappropriate at a graveyard ceremony eulogizing American dead. Opponents have been equally energetic. Leading the most colorful "no" campaign is Geert Wilders, a maverick lawmaker who has received death threats because of his anti-Islamic views. Escorted by dozens of guards, Wilders is on a two-week bus tour warning that further European integration could cost the Netherlands control over its tough immigration policy. Wilders has tapped into fears that last year's admission of 10 mostly eastern European countries will undermine the Dutch standard of living. He has also capitalized on concern about Muslim Turkey's bid to become a member and on widespread disapproval of the current government. He represents the far right, but opposition here spans the political spectrum.
Posted by:Steve

#8  I was wondering what happend to Ed Illustrated. I hope all is well.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-05-24 16:41  

#7  2b, as an American I don't find it all that depressing. Of course, I'd feel differently if I were an ambitious 20 year-old Frenchman who wanted to start or join a new high tech company, or if I were an EU partisan lusting for global grandeur.

The best outcome for us and, frankly, the world, is a Europe that is peaceful, prosperous, and focused on solving its own massive internal problems. Namely, the demographic + internal muslim subversion nightmare that threatens the creation of Eurabia in two generations' time. If the elites would focus squarely on these real and present dangers and spend less time posturing absurdly as the "moral superpower", we'd all be better off.
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex)   2005-05-24 13:14  

#6  "Holland is in a very inward mood. It's hiding behind the d....," said historian Han van der Horst.

The Dutch people are hiding behind lesbians? Man! Those wooden shoes are finally having an effect...

Sorry - Early morning, out of practice... Six weeks since regular poster here...

Seriously, I'd figure Netherlands would be one of the most likely other than the UK to fight the EU hegemony, owing to their history...
Posted by: BigEd   2005-05-24 12:38  

#5  jeeze lex..that's depressing. You are probably right.
Posted by: 2b   2005-05-24 12:25  

#4  The people see the basic contradiction between the EU elites' aggrandizing vision and their social welfare convictions. The EU cannot be a unitary superpower rival to the US and still be socialist. The only way to make EU socialism more powerful is to destroy it. ie, if the Europeans are serious about challenging the US in the world, then they'll have no choice but to get economic growth up to the 4% range, which requires greater deregulation and diverting a far higher % of economic and social resources to high-growth, private sector technology businesses and to the military. To compete efffectively with the hypercapitalist hyperpower, they have no choice but to become much more like the hypercapitalist hyperpower.

My money's on the EU people choosing to be fat, protected, socialist and a minor player on the world stage. A loose and decentralized federation is the outcome here, no matter how the EU constitution votes are rigged turn out.
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex)   2005-05-24 12:09  

#3  they could do it if they had the good of the people at heart...but those in the driver's seat have empire on their mind.

A common wealth based on common sense is a good idea. They need washington/jefferson/madison rather than a chirac and galloway.
Posted by: 2b   2005-05-24 12:00  

#2  The EU constitution's beside the point, which has zip to do with right vs left, capitalist vs socialist. The Dutch, and the French, and the Germans and the Italians and most west Europeans are sik and tired of any talk about greater centralization and would like their governments to focus on matters at home. Most Europeans are still trying to come to terms with competition from Poland and Czech; their minds boggle at the idea of their self-appointed betters expanding the EU to include Turkey.

This could have been predicted a decade ago, when the EU first launched a drive to expand eastward. Simply no way the EU can double its size and retain anything like coherence. EU expansion = EU weakening and greater distraction.
Posted by: thibaud (aka lex)   2005-05-24 11:49  

#1  
But it complains that opponents confuse the constitution with their anti-Europe sentiments or their resentment of politicians in general.
That ain't confusion, honey - that's common sense.
"The referendum is about more than complicated procedures. It's about making Europe faster, more democratic and more transparent"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Oh, wait - he's serious?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-05-24 11:41  

00:00