You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Secret UK troops plan for Afghan crisis
2005-05-23
Oooo....secret troops! Or a secret plan! Whatever! It's a secret....
Yeah. So don't tell nobody!
DEFENCE chiefs are planning to rush thousands of British troops to Afghanistan in a bid to stop the country sliding towards civil war, Scotland on Sunday can reveal. Ministers have been warned they face a "complete strategic failure" of the effort to rebuild Afghanistan and that 5,500 extra troops will be needed within months if the situation continues to deteriorate. An explosive cocktail of feuding tribal warlords, insurgents, the remnants of the Taliban, and under-performing Afghan institutions has left the fledgling democracy on the verge of disintegration, according to analysts and senior officers.

The looming crisis in Afghanistan is a serious setback for the US-led 'War on Terror' and its bid to promote western democratic values around the world. Defence analysts say UK forces are already so over-stretched that any operation to restore order in Afghanistan can only succeed if substantial numbers of troops are redeployed from Iraq, itself in the grip of insurgency. The UK contribution to the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan presently stands at fewer than 500, compared with the contribution of 8,000 troops to the Coalition presence in Iraq.

Planners at the UK military's Northolt headquarters have drawn up emergency proposals to send up to 5,500 troops to Afghanistan to help avert a descent into more widespread bloodshed. As well as increasing the British presence in Afghanistan 10-fold, it would require additional funding of almost £500m. MoD sources confirmed last night that the secret plans have been firmed up in response to persistent concerns that the notorious rebel commander Gulbadeen Hikmatyar has teamed up with Taliban fighters in the south. An MoD source told Scotland on Sunday: "We are going into an area where there's a civil war going on. It's dangerous and it's somewhere new. People within the MoD are now saying we will have to deal with this and go into the south of the country. What they are saying is, don't do it piecemeal. We will have to do it properly." Senior army and navy officers, along with officials from the Treasury, were in the region last week to survey the options.
Posted by:Seafarious

#6  they got a huge drug problem...

They do got a huge drug problem, indeed. And why? Britain's Government, in its wisdom, given the task of dealing with the opium industry issue post-Taliban decided not to pursue an aggressive campaign but to go for some third-way baloney which failed outright, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It would only be fair that British troops made up the numbers required to deal with Labour's strategic failure.

You'd have thought they'd know from Northern Ireland that dealing with criminals wearing kid gloves solves nothing.
Posted by: Bulldog   2005-05-23 13:58  

#5  it's the dreaded Afghan Spring Summer Fall
Posted by: Frank G   2005-05-23 09:44  

#4  they got a huge drug problem. Theres always potential tension as Karzai leans back and forth between the Pashtuns and the pro-Northern Alliance minorities. But the Taliban seem to be in definite decline, either getting killed or surrendering. Its not quite where it should be, but this article is like out of nowhere.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2005-05-23 09:18  

#3  That's not the talk at the bar press club.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-05-23 08:38  

#2  Me too.
Posted by: raptor   2005-05-23 08:29  

#1  How odd. And I thought Afghanistan was doing so well.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-05-23 00:30  

00:00