Submit your comments on this article |
Europe |
Al-Qaeda courier told to convey message |
2005-05-21 |
In the papers, sent by the U.S. Department of Justice and obtained by Reuters, bin al-Shaibah is quoted as saying another Hamburg-based Moroccan, Zakariya Essabar, was sent to Afghanistan as an unwitting messenger to tell al Qaeda leaders when the attacks on the United States would take place. Essabar, a Moroccan who like the others was based in Hamburg, was to deliver the message to a contact called Mukhtar. Bin al-Shaibah "asked Essabar to convey the message Eleven Nine to Mukhtar, but insisted that he did not tell Essabar what the message meant", the documents say. At another point in his questioning, bin al-Shaibah "described Zakariya Essabar as a close associate, quickly adding that Essabar did not have any foreknowledge of the events of 11 September", they say. But at yet another time, bin al-Shaibah -- in jail at an undisclosed location -- described how an aide to Osama bin Laden "instructed Essabar to return (from Afghanistan) to Germany and to obtain a U.S. visa so that Essabar could travel to the United States to take part in the planned attacks". Neither bin al-Shaibah nor Essabar was granted a U.S. visa. Washington declined on security grounds to grant the German court access to bin al-Shaibah. But the written summaries of his interrogation are crucial to the Hamburg case in which Motassadeq is on trial for the second time, accused of complicity in the attacks on New York and Washington which killed nearly 3,000 people in 2001. In material previously released by U.S. authorities to the court, bin al-Shaibah was quoted as saying that Motassadeq had nothing to do with the plot. He was merely one of a group of Arabs who "studied jihad" and "engaged in vitriolic anti-U.S. discussions" at the Hamburg home of Mohamed Atta, the man who crashed the first hijacked plane into the World Trade Centre. The prosecution is likely to seize on the contradictions in the new information to argue that bin al-Shaibah was lying about both Essabar and Motassadeq and simply trying to cover up for his friends. The U.S. letter notes bin al-Shaibah's "inconsistent statements" on Essabar. It also says he "may have been intentionally withholding information and employing counter- interrogation techniques". On the other hand, the new U.S. material, consisting of summarised information from bin al-Shaibah and another captured al Qaeda suspect, mentions Motassadeq only once by name and does not contain any new incriminatory evidence against him. The U.S. letter also said the FBI had no further material on Motassadeq and Washington could not supply any more information to the court. |
Posted by:Dan Darling |
#5 Gromky, I always felt the assassination of Mashood by AQ was a pre-cursor defensive action, i.e. they wanted him out of the way as a potential threat to them after 9/11, when I am sure they were worried about the US response. Thankk GOD that gorean wasn't elected in 2000. I don't know what it would have looked like, but I know it would have been bad. |
Posted by: Brett 2005-05-21 16:09 |
#4 We all know what the numbers mean |
Posted by: Calypso Louie Farrakhan 2005-05-21 16:00 |
#3 regardless, be more observant towards early November. |
Posted by: shellback 2005-05-21 13:14 |
#2 Nop, no, makes perfect sense: Americans do dates mm/dd/yy, while others, like the Euros, do dd/mm/yy. |
Posted by: Ptah 2005-05-21 06:51 |
#1 This is just numerology. The code word "go" for 9/11 was the assassination of the Lion of Panjshir on 9/9. |
Posted by: gromky 2005-05-21 01:45 |