Submit your comments on this article |
Fifth Column |
Navy deserter gets three months hard labor |
2005-05-14 |
![]() A military judge ordered a Navy sailor on Thursday to complete three months of hard labor for refusing to deploy with his ship in protest of the war in Iraq, but he declined prosecutors' requests for time in custody. Lt. Cmdr. Bob Klant also reduced Pablo Paredes' rank from petty officer third class to seaman recruit, the lowest in the Navy. Before the sentence was imposed, Paredes read an impassioned statement of his beliefs. "If there is anything I could be guilty of, it is my beliefs," he said. "I am guilty of believing the war is illegal. I am guilty of believing war in all forms is immoral and useless, and I am guilty of believing that as a service member I have a duty to refuse to participate in this war because it is illegal." Paredes showed no emotion as the judge delivered the sentence. He left the court without speaking to reporters. Prosecutors had asked Klant to sentence Paredes to nine months in confinement, three months less than the possible maximum, and a bad conduct discharge. "He is trying to infect the military with his own philosophy of disobedience," prosecutor Lt. Brandon Hale said. "Sailors all over the world will want to know whether this will be tolerated. Sailors want to know whether doing what he did is a good way to get out of deployment." Prosecutors left the courtroom without making any statements, but Sam Samuelson, a Navy spokesman, said Paredes' guilty verdict sent a message. "His actions were in conflict with his duty and taxpayers' obligations that the Navy maintain good order and discipline," Samuelson said. The sentence of hard labor normally involves extra duty. For two of the three months, Paredes also will be restricted to his naval base. Paredes' lawyer, Jeremy Warren, called the judge's lesser sentence "a stunning blow to the prosecution." "This is an affirmation of every sailor's and military person's right to speak out and follow their conscience," he said. |
Posted by:seafarious |
#6 Piece of shit will be a nice emblem for the losing pacifists an dBDS victims |
Posted by: Frank G 2005-05-14 22:36 |
#5 Ironically it is those personnel in uniform that he deserted that resulted in his light sentence. Had they been suffering and dying in numbers, with low morale, bright boy there could have faced several years in Leavenworth. As it is, they are doing a very good job, appreciate that what they are doing is for a good cause, and have high morale because of it. So dumbass almost walks. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2005-05-14 22:22 |
#4 What a loser. If they had found he had tried to talk a couple of other sailors into doing what he did, then I wonder if he would have been charged with sedition or some such which would carry a harsher sentence. |
Posted by: JerseyMike 2005-05-14 07:26 |
#3 He was anti-war and anti-US before he enlisted. Did it for the $$ and perhaps to cause trouble. |
Posted by: too true 2005-05-14 07:16 |
#2 I am guilty of believing war in all forms is immoral If nothing is worth fighting for, what exactly are you doing in the Navy? |
Posted by: JerseyMike 2005-05-14 07:03 |
#1 Add this word to your vocabulary, Pablo |
Posted by: Raj 2005-05-14 00:56 |