You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Britain steps up private health provision
2005-05-13
BIRMINGHAM, England, May 13 (UPI) -- Use of the private sector to carry out operations on the British National Health Service will double in the next five years, the government said Friday. Newly appointed Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt told a Birmingham conference of NHS managers $5.6 billion would be spent on 1.7 million operations carried out by the private sector. The number of operations carried out by the private sector, but paid for by the NHS, will rise from the current 5 percent as high as 15 percent.
The government says using the private sector will ensure faster treatment and more choices for patients.
But, but, but I thought government run universal health care was the most efficent method? That's what Hillary said, anyway.
From the end of 2005, patients will be given the choice of five hospitals, including one from the private sector, for treatment. But opponents are concerned the move could potentially threaten the existence of the NHS.
That's not a bug, it's a feature

Vincent Marks, professor of clinical biochemistry at the University of Surrey, told the BBC: "This is really the destruction of the NHS. "Once you start farming it off into private enterprises the NHS as we understood it will gradually disintegrate."
One of our best friends living in Britain needed her gall bladder removed. NHS told here she'd have to wait 6 months to a year. She went to a private hospital, on her own dime, and had it done within a week.
Posted by:Steve

#3  They're pouring in another 5.6 bill euros????!
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-05-13 11:27  

#2  Once you allow private enterprise to compete with NHS, NHS will die off. Now, why do you suppose that is? Could it *possibly* be the *same* reason that *every* other socialist programme dies off in the face of private enterprise? Every...single...one? Does that not register? Do they not have any pattern recognition whatsoever? Should they be in a position of leadership without having a functioning judgement center in their brains?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-05-13 10:36  

#1  And if you go to Washington Monthly (and no, I'm not providing a link to those harlots) you'll find Kevin Drum waxing on about how good European health care compared to ours. He makes a few obligatory noises about how the British NHS "may not be the model" for us, but he prefers even that to ours.

Fools.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-05-13 09:01  

00:00