You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan/South Asia
Afghan leaders support long-term US presence
2005-05-09
Most Afghans support President Hamid Karzai's bid to have long-term security ties with the United States, the president's spokesman said after a gathering of more than 1,000 chiefs and regional leaders on Sunday. The question of whether US forces should be given permanent bases in Afghanistan has sparked debate in a country with a long history of resisting foreign intervention and in a region where big powers have long competed for influence.
Given their history — all of it — they should maybe give serious consideration to developing some long-term alliances...
Afghanistan's relationship with the United States was one of the main issues Karzai raised with the assembly of national representatives he summoned for talks on Sunday. "Our findings from today's discussions were that people, on the whole, (are) very positive about this, and I think that people are thinking, by and large, exactly the same line as we had expected," Karzai's spokesman Jawed Ludin told a news conference after the assembly. Karzai would discuss Afghanistan's strategic relations with the United States when he meets President George W. Bush on a US visit this month, Ludin said. The possibility of permanent bases was raised in February when US Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican, said during an Afghan visit they would be in the interests of US and regional security.
Posted by:Fred

#4  If we can't use Incerlik for strike aircraft and specops then it's use is limited and of limited value!
Posted by: raptor   2005-05-09 16:41  

#3  It will take a while to formalize agreements and build a suitable infrastructure. And I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss the continuing value of Incerlik, were we able to use it for various operations. But if we can't then it is of little value.
Posted by: rkb   2005-05-09 10:14  

#2  Don't forget we have K2 in Uzbekistan also. Incerlik was important during cold war since it support our large voice and code intercept mission in Turkey as well as being a TAC forward base. But times are a changin and its time to give up the ghost of wars past.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2005-05-09 09:30  

#1  Long term bases in Afgan makes a lot more sense than keeping Incerlik open.
Posted by: raptor   2005-05-09 07:34  

00:00