By Lt Col (R) M Zaman Malik
"The matter rests with UN and Pakistan does not swear to adhere with its verdict with bad intentions. We stick to what we promise. In that case India should rather be ruled by Muslims who have been ruling it since 712 AD. And the J&K Muslims will rule India as their forefathers have been ruling them. So, this is what India can get from the Muslims of J&K, if it takes a U-turn from pledge acceptance of UN resolutions. Before British for a short while (they had to go back in any case) we were the rulers of India. We shall claim any part now under the occupation of India. India belongs to us. It is the Muslims who gave it the name of 'Hindustan'. Prior to that it had no name. Every small state had its different name. There were Hindus however, in the Karnataka/Southern India. Tuzk-i-Babri though in Persian tells all about this and Emperor Jehangir had further elaborated upon what his father had said in his Tuzk-I-Jehangiri. In any case, Babar also came from the areas from where the Aryans had come many long centuries before he came.We shall get those areas in which our mothers, sisters and daughters have been treated by the beasts and this cannot be described. Our sacrifices of millions since partition will not go waste. We shall come, if you don't give us our majority areas. What was decided by the 'Cabinet Mission' (the last one) in June 1946? Attlee like Blair was hastened by the Pax-Americana to leave every principle in the Lurch in order to face threat obtaining from Korean side. The world is fed up with threats after threats by the Zionist US and its allies. ... Pakistan is a moderate Islamic State. It abhors extremism, individual acts, should not be attributed to Islamic teaching. Are the Hindus, Jews ad Christians, doing exactly what there Holy Scriptures have ordained them do?"