You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Reports: Airport security hasn't improved
2005-04-16
Doom and gloom on airport security...
Security at U.S. airports is no better under federal control than it was before the Sept. 11 attacks, a key House member says two government reports will conclude.
Lemme see here... We went from contractors to civil servants, non-union to unionized. Anybody surprised?
The Government Accountability Office -- the investigative arm of Congress -- and the Homeland Security Department's inspector general are expected to soon release their findings on the performance of Transportation Security Administration screeners. "A lot of people will be shocked at the billions of dollars we've spent and the results they're going to see, which confirm previous examinations of the Soviet-style screening system we've put in place," Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., told The Associated Press on Friday. Mica chairs the House aviation subcommittee and was briefed on the reports.
I don't know that I'd go so far as to call the system "Soviet-style." We had a system with weaknesses, so in the wake of 9-11 we threw the whole thing away and replaced it with another system with weaknesses.
The TSA won't comment on the specifics of the reports until they are released, spokesman Mark Hatfield Jr. said.
I wonder if that'd be Mark O. Hatfield, Jr.? Anybody see a problem here?
But, he said: "When the political posturing is over, rational people will see that American screeners today are the best we have ever had and that they are limited only by current technology and security procedures that are significantly influenced by privacy demands."
We could have had incremental improvements, but we went for a shiny new system. Now we can improve it incrementally.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Pappy! You must be talkin' about .... {dare I use the word?} PROFILEN! Shame on you.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-04-16 10:30:54 PM  

#1  American screeners... are limited only by current technology and security procedures that are significantly influenced by privacy demands.

Not to mention policies that search old ladies and five year olds on a more-strict basis than 18-45 year old males of Middle-Eastern origin....
Posted by: Pappy   2005-04-16 3:13:17 PM  

00:00