You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Army Lab Improves Abrams Shield
2005-04-06
Adelphi, Md.: The Army Research Laboratory played a major role in the development of a shield to protect the Abrams tank's exhaust system against enemy threats during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The lab was contacted after reports of Iraqi troops zeroing in on the exhaust system in an attempt to put the Abrams out of commission. In addition, several Marine Corps vehicles also showed similar vulnerabilities against these threats, said Mike Zoltoski, the survivability technology coordinator in the Weapons and Materials Research Directorate.
The lab worked with the Program Manager for Abrams, General Dynamics Land Systems, Aberdeen Test Center, Army Evaluation Center and the National Ground Intelligence Center from the initial phase of design to the completion of the evaluation. "It was a team effort," said Zoltoski. "The whole process from design to test and evaluation only took about four days, and the results proved the shield offered valuable protection."
Critical to the effort was the Aberdeen Test Center, which constructed and evaluated the prototype shield against actual threat munitions and determined that the addition of the shield did not degrade the automotive performance of the Abrams. Similar shields also were developed for the Marine Corps' vehicles.
General Dynamics Land Systems built 20 shields at the Lima Army Tank Plant, Lima, OH, which were delivered to Iraq within a week of first receiving the call for help. President George W. Bush specifically thanked workers at the plant for their role in the development of this item during his recent visit.
The Army lab has a long history of transitioning armor technologies from the laboratory to the field. The group of scientists, engineers and technicians that helped design the shield were also responsible for the armor designs used on the Abrams and reactive armor for the Marine Corp M60s, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Stryker. Currently, they are working on lightweight advanced armors for the Future Combat Systems, including structural armor to protect against small arms projectiles.
Posted by:Steve

#9  I've worked on Government contracts before: the turn-around time is incredible. Kudos to whoever rooted out the red tape (Even money says it was Rummy.)
Posted by: Ptah   2005-04-06 8:10:04 PM  

#8  haha M60s in C-130?! where someone read that? even striker has problems to be transported by C-130
Posted by: Hupomoque Spoluter7949   2005-04-06 7:55:43 PM  

#7  M-60 tare weight

C-130 capacity

Things that make you go Hmmm...
Posted by: Bodyguard   2005-04-06 6:18:21 PM  

#6  M-60s can be carried by C-130s.
Posted by: RWV   2005-04-06 4:23:56 PM  

#5  I am pleasantly surprised to see that Lima, OH, is still churning out heavy equipment! They used to manufacture a lot of locomotives there in the past century or more.
Posted by: Dar   2005-04-06 1:23:27 PM  

#4  The M60 Patton main battle tank is now primarily found in US Reserve and National Guard units, but served as the primary US main battle tank for two decades prior to the introduction of the M1. Developed from the M48 Patton series, the M60 was fitted with a 105mm main gun and manned by a four-man crew.
Posted by: Steve   2005-04-06 1:20:57 PM  

#3  I believe the M48 was also called a Patton.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-04-06 11:46:09 AM  

#2  Nope. They did use them in Desert Storm, the M60's made short work of the SRG T-72's. The M60 is well suited for Sand/Desert work, owing to it's lower ground pressure on the tracks, and it's efficient engine air cleaners. I don't think we used the Reactive Armor during DS, but the Israelis use it on their fleet.
Posted by: Bodyguard   2005-04-06 11:20:45 AM  

#1  M60s? There are Marine units still using Pattons? I thought the last Pattons were given to the Army Corps of Engineers for offshore reef-building and harbor modifications in the mid-90s?
Posted by: Mitch H.   2005-04-06 10:50:26 AM  

00:00