You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
US Byrd Amendment: Commission proposes sanctions on US products
2005-04-01
In application of a WTO ruling, the Commission has today adopted a proposal to impose sanctions on certain products from the United States. The Commission took this latest step in the dispute over the Byrd Amendment in light of the continuing failure of the United States to bring its legislation in conformity with its international obligations. The Commission proposes that an additional duty of 15% applies as of 1 May 2005 on a range of products which include paper, agricultural, textile and machinery products. In taking this action the Commission has acted in close coordination with seven other co-complainants.

The Commission's proposal comes in application of the authorisation granted in November 2004 by the WTO to impose retaliatory measures against the United States for its failure to respect its international obligations. The Byrd Amendment which was first ruled illegal by the WTO in January 2003 should have been repealed by 27 December 2003. More than a year later, the United States has still not respected its international obligations.

The sanctions would take the form of additional duties imposed on a list of products imported from the US.

The level of retaliation applied as from 1 May 2005 is based on the latest distribution of duties made under the Byrd Amendment and is slightly below US $ 28 million.

This level will be revised annually to adjust to the level of damage caused to EU companies. This is motivated by the important variation in the Byrd disbursement made each year by the United States. The Commission's proposal includes a first list of products that would be subject to the additional duty as from 1 May 2005. In order to allow for eventual revision in the amount of sanctions, a 'reserve list' has been added. The products included in this reserve list could become subject to the additional import duty in case the level of suspension increases in the future.

Background

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (so-called Byrd Amendment) provides that anti-dumping and countervailing duties collected following a complaint from US companies are distributed to those companies that brought or supported the complaints.

In the four annual distributions that have taken place since 2000, more than US $1 billion has been distributed. The main recipients have been in the bearing, steel and other metal, household item and food (in particular pasta) sectors. A substantial increase is foreseen for the next distribution that could start on 1 October 2005 if the Byrd Amendment is not repealed. That distribution alone could amount to US $1,6 billion.

A Panel in September 2002 and the Appellate Body in January 2003 confirmed that the Byrd Amendment is an illegal response to dumping and subsidisation. The US had until 27 December 2003 to bring its legislation into conformity with the WTO rules. Eight WTO members (Brazil, Canada, Chile, the EU, India, Japan, Korea and Mexico) then requested the WTO to authorise retaliation on 26 January 2004. Following an arbitration decision on the appropriate level of retaliation, the eight complainants were authorised at the end of 2004 to apply sanctions to the United States. It is the first time that so many members have been authorised to apply retaliation in the same dispute. The eight members represent altogether 71% of total US exports and 64% of total US imports.

The EU and the seven other WTO members are maintaining a close cooperation. To this end, the EU understands that Canada will be announcing retaliatory measures against certain products from the United States and expects that other co-complainants will soon join it in applying retaliation.

Despite calls by the US administration to repeal the law, the US Congress has not yet implemented the WTO ruling and repealed the Byrd legislation.

Comment from a trader in Hungry
comment

...The indications are that the Eurozone is heading for for economic catastrophe, and that social unrest and political extremism are likely to grip many EU states. Not to mention the impact of rejection of the EU Constitution ...
Posted by:3dc

#6  Problem here is that the dollar has gotten "cheap" - and therefore so have US goods. And Euro goods have gone up with the Euro.

Thats what this is all about.

The WTO will wreck the world economy by raising tariffs. Have the not seen the effects of Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act and subsequent tariff wars in kicking off the depression on top of a deflationary economy in Europe?

If Canada & Mexico start the whole process, its time to shut the borders with them. Put up a fence and check them rigorously before we allow them in. They need us far more than we need them.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-04-01 2:25:46 PM  

#5  Problem here is that the dollar has gotten "cheap" - and therefore so have US goods. And Euro goods have gone up with the Euro.

Thats what this is all about.

The WTO will wreck the world economy by raising tariffs. Have the not seen the effects of Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act and subsequent tariff wars in kicking off the depression on top of a deflationary economy in Europe?

If Canada & Mexico start the whole process, its time to shut the borders with them. Put up a fence and check them rigorously before we allow them in. They need us far more than we need them.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-04-01 2:25:46 PM  

#4  Sorry, but I think the WTO ruling against the Byrd Amendment is absolutely correct.
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-04-01 3:22:13 PM  

#3  I hear sheets and robes are exempt...
Posted by: tu3031   2005-04-01 2:30:19 PM  

#2  Despite calls by the US administration to repeal the law, the US Congress has not yet implemented the WTO ruling and repealed the Byrd legislation.

Can you imagine how long the Kleagle would filibuster to keep a law with his name on it from being repealed?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-04-01 2:28:29 PM  

#1  Problem here is that the dollar has gotten "cheap" - and therefore so have US goods. And Euro goods have gone up with the Euro.

Thats what this is all about.

The WTO will wreck the world economy by raising tariffs. Have the not seen the effects of Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act and subsequent tariff wars in kicking off the depression on top of a deflationary economy in Europe?

If Canada & Mexico start the whole process, its time to shut the borders with them. Put up a fence and check them rigorously before we allow them in. They need us far more than we need them.
Posted by: OldSpook   2005-04-01 2:25:46 PM  

00:00