You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Horn
UN Council May Act in S. Sudan But Not in Darfur
2005-03-23
The U.N.'s version of "hit 'em where they ain't ..."
The U.N. Security Council may adopt a resolution this week sending peacekeepers to relatively calm southern Sudan but take no action against perpetrators of atrocities in Darfur. The United States decided on Tuesday to split its draft resolution on Sudan into three parts, with only the peacekeeping force for southern Sudan fairly certain of approval. The two main measures on the Darfur region -- sanctions and a venue to try war crimes suspects -- face opposition. "We were literally running out of time on Sudan and we felt strongly that we had to move ahead," Anne Patterson, the acting U.S. ambassador, told reporters. "So what we have done is circulate three draft resolutions, one on peacekeeping, one on sanctions, and one that would provide for measures to end impunity," she said.
Send in the mighty Uruguayans!
The United States hopes to have at least the peacekeeping resolution adopted this week. Council members are consulting their governments before consultations on Wednesday. "It is clear there is very broad support for the peacekeeping resolution and that is very very critical because it will strengthen the new government in Sudan and get more boots on the ground," Patterson said.
Posted by:Fred

#6  The UN recently released it official Darfur death count of 180,000. Some aid groups say it's 300,000.
Posted by: ed   2005-03-23 1:48:32 PM  

#5  hey guys, its not the UN bureucrats OR the peacekeepers who are preventing a UNSC resolution to adopt sanctions wrt to Darfur. Its the virtual certainty of a Chinese veto. Place blame where blame belongs.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2005-03-23 1:14:44 PM  

#4  Maybe the UN bureaucrats think that the problem will go away if they act as if it doesn't exist...

Given the official death rate of 10,000/month (the reality likely being much higher), aren't they right?
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-03-23 12:52:23 PM  

#3  ...sending peacekeepers to relatively calm southern Sudan

The little boys must be cuter there...
Posted by: Raj   2005-03-23 12:36:02 PM  

#2  Maybe the UN bureaucrats think that the problem will go away if they act as if it doesn't exist...
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-23 10:33:06 AM  

#1  "Well, I guess we can call it a day. Who's up for brunch?"
Posted by: PBMcL   2005-03-23 12:48:12 AM  

00:00