You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
NYT: There Are Signs the Tide May Be Turning on Iraq's Street of Fear
2005-03-21
EFL. A long journalistic color piece by usually reliable John Burns. Perhaps a New Yorker can tell us if this one made page 1. Was the Saturday article just a trial baloon?

As interesting as the content of the article is whether the MYT is making an explicit decision to climb back from the extreme anti-American position it has had for the last few years. After losing Howell Raines, it seems the inmates he left behind took over the asylum. Is this changing?

American soldiers call the street Purple Heart Boulevard: the First Battalion of the Ninth Cavalry, patrolling here for the past year before its recent rotation back to base at Fort Hood, Tex., received more than 160 Purple Hearts. Many patrols were on foot, to gather intelligence on neighborhoods that American officers say have been the base for brutal car bombings, kidnappings and assassinations across Baghdad. In the first 18 months of the fighting, the insurgents mostly outmaneuvered the Americans along Haifa Street, showing they could carry the war to the capital's core with something approaching impunity. ... "We know that we face a learning enemy, just as we learn from him," said Maj. Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, who left Baghdad recently after a year commanding the First Cavalry Division, responsible for overall security in Baghdad and for the 800-member task force dedicated to Haifa Street. "But I believe we are gaining the upper hand," he said.

For now, the days when rebels could gather in groups as large as 150, pinning down American troops for as long as six hours at a time, have tapered off. American officers say only three Haifa Street mortars have hit the Green Zone in the past six months; in the last two weeks of September alone, 11 Haifa Street mortars hit the sprawling zone. In recent weeks, with the new Iraqi units on hand, the Americans have sent up to 1,500 men at a time on sweeps, uncovering insurgent weapons caches and arresting insurgent leaders like Ali Mama, the name taken by a gangster who was once a favored hit man for Saddam Hussein. He is now in Abu Ghraib; others who have become local legends with attacks on the Americans have been killed, including one who used the nom-de-guerre Ra'id the Hunter, American intelligence officers say. The two Iraqi battalions, backed by a new battalion from the Third Infantry Division, will now bear the main burden of establishing order in the sprawling district around Haifa Street - three miles deep and about half as wide, encompassing about 170,000 people, the city's main railway yards, current and former government buildings, and the Mansour Melia Hotel, favored by many Westerners based in Baghdad. ...

American morale, for the moment, is high. Lt. Col. Thomas D. Macdonald, the cavalry division officer who commanded the Haifa Street task force, believes that the Iraqis, with an affinity for their own people, can push the rebels farther back. "I've got the enemy to the point where he can't do large-scale operations anymore, only the small-scale stuff," he said recently, during one of his last patrols, at the head of a company of 120 soldiers. "If we put in more Iraqi garrisons like this, that will be the final nail in the coffin."

When Iraqi units began to serve in combat zones, desertion rates were high. During the first offensive in Falluja, last April, some soldiers refused to fight. But over the past nine months, a $5 billion American-financed effort has bought Iraqi units more than 100,000 Kalashnikov rifles, 100,000 flak jackets, 110,000 pistols, 6,000 cars and pickup trucks, and 230 million rounds of ammunition. In place of the single Iraqi battalion trained last June, there are more than 90 battalions now, totaling about 60,000 army and special police troops. No one is certain how many insurgents they face; the number, including foot soldiers, safe-house operators, organizers and financiers, is estimated to be 12,000 to 20,000. Iraqi units still complain about unequal equipment, particularly the lack of the heavy armor the Americans use, like Bradley fighting vehicles and Abrams tanks. But the complaints among American officers about "tiny heart syndrome" - a caustic reference to some Iraqi units' unwillingness to expose themselves to combat - have diminished. "Now, they're ready to fight," said Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the American officer overseeing the retraining effort, in a recent interview at his Green Zone headquarters.
snip. We could probably have gotten to this point a lot sooner if we had not pursued the de-Baathification policy. It still seems like the correct decision to me, but it will be interesting to see what we think about it in 5 years.
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#6   Greyhawk over at Mudville Gazette isn't very happy with Mr. Wong's reportage:

"Those who disembowel aid workers and turn victims of Down's Syndrome into 'suicide bombers' have no greater champion than Ed Wong."

I'm not so sure about that. Dexter Filkins of the NYT is pretty close.

Posted by: Matt   2005-03-21 6:46:07 PM  

#5  Someone, that's by Edward Wong. If Wong saw Rummy using Zarqawi's head as a bowling ball, he'd find some way to spin it.

"The toughness of Mr. Zarqawi's skull enabled the beleaguered Secretary of Defense to pick up a difficult spare, foreshadowing further resurgence blah blah blah..."
Posted by: Matt   2005-03-21 3:39:57 PM  

#4  Check this out, though. The Times is still far from sane.
Posted by: someone   2005-03-21 3:02:00 PM  

#3  MD: We could probably have gotten to this point a lot sooner if we had not pursued the de-Baathification policy.

Don't really see it. De-Baathification was necessary because we weren't going to run Iraq like a protectorate, which is what we did in West Germany. We wrote Germany's constitution and let them elect their own leaders 5 years after the end of the war. There was no question of West Germany ejecting US troops at any time in the occupation. Any attempt to do that in the first few decades of the postwar era would have resulted in the disbanding of the West German Army (Bundeswehr) and a protracted war to keep the West Germans down. These are not options with Iraq.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-03-21 10:51:52 AM  

#2  Mrs. D: In the national print edition this is front-page below the fold (close but no cigar.)
The main thing the NYT has done with its Iraq coverage is to contract it from a couple of front-page articles and two full inside pages down to usually one front-page article and one inside page. Oddly enough, this change occurred shortly after January 30.

Burns is good but you get the impression that the editors are on-call 24 hours a day to dilute any positive reports. For example: "American morale, for the moment, is high..." "For the moment" looks like it was stuck in by an editor, and what the hell does it mean? That we should expect a collapse in American morale any minute? In your transi dreams, NYT dudes.
Posted by: Matt   2005-03-21 10:40:50 AM  

#1  Arthur Sulzberger continues to piss away his once magnificent inheritance to stay in the good graces of the Kool Aid Kocktail Circuit Krowd. The New Yellow Times is rotten from top to bottom. Burns needs a smoke detector and a new inner ear, it seems, to alert him he's on a ship that's burning and sinking.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 10:30:52 AM  

00:00