You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Sen. Clinton goes right
2005-03-21
Posted by:Fred

#27  Lol, RC! It all comes out of the same end, too.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 1:43:55 PM  

#26  Think of Hillary as a fullback. She likes to fake right, but goes left.
Posted by: badanov   2005-03-21 1:36:49 PM  

#25  I think by "sandbox rules" the thing calling itself "TKAT" means it will crap where ever it wants.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-03-21 1:33:30 PM  

#24  Back in 92-93 I read a speech that she gave about the "politics of meaning." It sounded really familiar, and then I remembered: "The Port Huron Manifesto," the founding document of the SDS. She is a true believer of the new left's pov. If we elect her, we deserve what we get. The 60's are alive and well with Hillary.
Posted by: SR71   2005-03-21 1:32:27 PM  

#23  She's an advocate of indoctrination early preschool education.....see how easy it is to spin?
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-21 1:32:25 PM  

#22  "The village is determined to help you raise your child whether you like it or not."

Lol - well put, DB... but she only represents the insane moonbat part of town.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 1:12:47 PM  

#21  http://clinton.senate.gov/~clinton/speeches/2005314533.html
Here is a speech the Hildabeast recently gave to the Kaiser Family Foundation in which she totally ignores the positive results of the study Generation M: Media in the Lives of Kids 8 to 18. The study found there is virtually no overall effect of media on childrens'behavior. She seems to be telling parents that they are not raising their children the way she would and that's a bad thing. Exposing our children to so much of this unchecked media," she said, "is a kind of contagion," a "silent epidemic" that threatens "long-term public health damage to many, many children and therefore to society."
The study found no evidence of declining grades or neglect of reading due to TV watching. "It does not appear that spending time with media takes away from the time children spend in other pursuits," Kaiser reports. "Indeed, those young people who spend the most time watching TV...also reported spending more time with their parents than any other group."
She also failed to mention that the three most popular TV choices were situation comedies when she stated "the content [of kids' entertainment] is overwhelmingly, astoundingly violent,"
"I hope we can do more to educate parents on media literacy," said Clinton, who also wants to give them "guidance in using the filtering technologies." The village is determined to help you raise your child whether you like it or not.
Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is a leftie who thinks she and the Government know more about how to raise your child than you do and if she has her way she and Congress will do just that.
http://www.kff.org/entmedia/7251.cfm The links are to Senator Clinton's speech and to the Kaise Family Foundation study.


Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-03-21 1:05:38 PM  

#20  In 2003, Hillary was even more liberal than John Kerry, who scored 85% on the ADA scale. Talk about a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-03-21 12:40:09 PM  

#19  Tkat: I don't think she actually believes in much of anything beyond her own advancement first and foremost.

She believes the major tenets of liberalism, but will say conservative-sounding things to get elected. Hillary's statements (like Lieberman's) are well to the right of her actual votes. Her 2003 Senate voting record scored her a 95% rating with Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), a liberal lobbying group. By comparison, Lincoln Chafee, the most liberal Republican in the Senate, scored 65% on the ADA scale.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-03-21 12:38:41 PM  

#18  You painted Bush with the same lameness as Kerry..

McCain/Feingold and Medicare's prescription drug benefit are instances where the President hasn't exactly done a bang-up job.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-03-21 12:32:03 PM  

#17  .Com - Sandbox Rules?
Posted by: Tkatrollin   2005-03-21 11:51:42 AM  

#16  Lol! I know you think you're clever - but you're just proving what an ass you are. Got something to actually SAY? Then say it.

I do - you're a troll.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 11:47:40 AM  

#15  .Com - Sandbox Rules?
Posted by: Tkatrollin   2005-03-21 11:36:41 AM  

#14  You mean this?

All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten
-Robert Fulghum


Look, you're responsible for what you post. Quit whining.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 11:27:10 AM  

#13  .Com - Sandbox Rules?
Posted by: Tkatrollin   2005-03-21 11:14:31 AM  

#12  Tkatrollin - Dunno WTF that's supposed to mean, but this is the second BS post of yours today.

As for putting the "safety" on, lol, that isn't the problem...

Either you're a lazy poster who doesn't really think about what he's posting - or you're trolling. You posted that claptrap. I just pointed out what it is.

Pray tell, where was I amiss? You painted Bush with the same lameness as Kerry - and yes, I take offense at that as it's obviously untrue. Kerry and his dissolving party deserve the trip to irrelevance they're working so hard toward. President Bush has done the job.

Don't wag your finger at me for calling a spade a spade. Edit your posts better if that was not what you meant to say.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 10:52:13 AM  

#11  .Com. - Enough said. Hope you are correct regarding the Great Prez. History will judge, right? Don't suppose we could ask for more. Obviously you've been po'd. I ain't. Calm down for a moment and put the safety back on that keyboard. You read alot more into the words than need be. Jumping at shadows rarely yields good results.
Posted by: Tkatrollin   2005-03-21 10:43:08 AM  

#10  Tkat - Okay, now I know you're a troll.

We, the sane people of America, had the best choice in 2004 we could possibly have hoped for - President Bush.

If you want to wank off regards the stunning lack of Dhimmidonk candidates, fine, but it doesn't have fuck all to do with the Pubs - they had a no-shit Great President to offer, and America snarfed him up for 4 more years. Piss off.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 10:20:08 AM  

#9  Like alot of our elected representatives, she is simply an opportunist and hypocrit who uses people to get the office and then proceeds to forget them and get on with the task of self-promotion. She and her peers need to be slapped down and returned to whence they came. I don't think she actually believes in much of anything beyond her own advancement first and foremost. But that's par for the course isn't it?! Hopefully, our two party system can produce better choices than what was served up in 2004!
Posted by: Tkat   2005-03-21 9:59:09 AM  

#8  somebody will step up to her left, and force her to move left in the primaries. She's unelectable to most Americans - we're not like her limousine liberal harridans in NY
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-21 9:52:16 AM  

#7  Why? Sen. Clinton could make the party platform the Communist Manifesto and have it reported in the press as "Democrats move to the center."
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-03-21 8:40:57 AM  

#6  Clinton goes right, Dean goes left. My, my, an interesting practical display of political physics. It will be entertaining to watch at least. I believe the phrase 'A house divided can not stand' is the most likely outcome.
Posted by: Thans Anginetch3773   2005-03-21 8:27:37 AM  

#5  Hmmm, I can't recall the FAA regs for flying brooms, minimums, CAT spacing, etc. Got any idea, AP?
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 1:37:00 AM  

#4  Just remember: if all it took to stay was NOT deporting a five-year-old kid to Cuba, Bill and Hillary's people were unable to pull through. They may be "conservative," but not the sorts of conservatives we want or need.

We need another liberal like Bush.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-03-21 1:17:32 AM  

#3  Headline: Sen. Clinton goes right

That should read "Hillary *talks* right". So did Jimmy Carter. And John Kerry. It's not what they say that matters - it's what they've said - and done - over most of their lifetime.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-03-21 12:36:36 AM  

#2  Uh oh, swerving right!

Everybody duck!

BTW, it's an obvious spelling error: it's "preying", methinks
Posted by: .com   2005-03-21 12:16:40 AM  

#1  "possibly for a White House run" POSSIBLY????

And the senator says, proudly, "I've always been a praying person." Besides praying that Slick Willy would get his, um, Willie caught in Mr. Zipper, what else have you prayed for, Hilly?
Posted by: Bobby   2005-03-21 12:12:14 AM  

00:00