You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Oh, for Gawd's Sake ....
2005-03-19
"Hey, y'all! Look what happens when I do this!... Ow!"
A MAN who became a paraplegic at 14 when he dived off a road bridge into a New South Wales river was awarded more than $1 million in damages today. Philip Dederer, now 20, sued the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) and the Great Lakes Shire Council in the NSW Supreme Court after he was paralysed in a diving accident off the Forster/Tuncurry Bridge into the Wallamba River on December 31, 1998. Mr Dederer, from Newcastle, claimed the RTA and the council were negligent despite there being signs prohibiting diving, because the signs did not say diving was dangerous.
Horrors!@ And no one mentioned that you could drown in water, either!! I think a second settlement is in order .... sigh.
Justice John Dunford agreed and today awarded Mr Dederer $1,050,000 in damages. He ruled the RTA was 80 per cent responsible for the accident and should pay $840,000, while the council was liable for 20 per cent of the damages to a total of $210,000. The judge ruled the signs erected were inadequate because young people continued to dive from the bridge.
Couldn't be because they are stupid or unsupervised ... nope, it's the signs' fault. Ijits.
"I am satisfied that the signs were not effective in the sense that large numbers of young people continued to dive, do somersaults, etc from the bridge," he said. But he ruled Mr Dederer was partially responsible for his injuries and therefore reduced his original $1.4 million payout by 25 per cent. Outside court, Mr Dederer said he was relieved with the result but was concerned teenagers and children were still diving off the same bridge and the signs had not been changed. "I wouldn't like to see another person get into the same position as I did," he said. Judge Dunford ruled the RTA pay 80 per cent and the council 20 per cent of Mr Dederer's costs.
Posted by:anon

#9  why fine or shoot them? - let them be - no compensation though
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-19 6:07:42 PM  

#8  The solution to this is very simple. Sentence anyone caught diving off to death, fine them $500,000 and have the signs say that violators will be shot on sight. After the first 20 morons get shot, it'll stop. And humanity's average IQ will go up a fraction of a percent.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2005-03-19 5:52:57 PM  

#7  I had a high school buddy who was cliff diving(short - like 20' high) into a pond, and missed the deep part. He had a nice funeral, and nobody got rich. Twas his own f*&kin fault
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-19 12:32:23 PM  

#6  Life's tough, ain't it? He could afford to toss himself off a high bridge into low water.

No matter how much money he gets, it's not going to add a digit to his IQ.
Posted by: Fred   2005-03-19 12:26:56 PM  

#5  too f*ckin bad. Actions have consequences
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-19 12:25:37 PM  

#4  I think this is probably more a matter that a 20 year old paraplegic has high expenses and is just looking for a way to cover them. Somebody has to pay to support him because he can't support himself.
Posted by: Tom   2005-03-19 12:05:51 PM  

#3  I wish the heck I had a better picture of this sign. ..

Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-03-19 11:19:57 AM  

#2  Slowly but surely, we are becoming societies in which we bear not the slightest responsibility for the consequences to us of our own carelessness, impulsiveness, irresponsibility or stupidity, but we are somehow magically accountable for the consequences to others of their own stupid acts.

I can't imagine anything more sure to drive us mad.
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-03-19 11:08:41 AM  

#1  
Posted by: .com   2005-03-19 10:07:39 AM  

00:00