Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Culture Wars |
Garry Trudeau Desperately Seeks Some Attention.... |
2005-03-19 |
EFL![]() Maybe because strips about Abu Ghraib have been done to death? "I'm not sure it's commonly understood to what lengths this administration is willing to go to bypass the 'filter,' as Bush calls the media," the cartoonist replied in an e-mail interview. Translation..."I'm relevant, DAMMIT!!" "The president made it official Wednesday -- his Justice Department, fresh from signing off on torture, apparently thinks propaganda's OK too." As opposed to the careful analysis provided by, say, a hack overrated cartoonist. But I digress... When asked if he thought the press has underreported the Gannon episode, pundit payola, and other examples of media manipulation, Trudeau said: "everybody knows the only ones allowed to defend fake news are troglodyte media like CBS and the NY Times!!" Trudeau, who was referring to George W. Bush's remarks about government-created video news releases for TV stations, started the "Doonesbury" sequence this Monday and said he will continue it through next week. In it, Secretary of Toady Affairs Andrews finds a "stooge" to replace Gannon as a lobber of softball questions in the White House press corps. He's Roland Hedley, the Gannon is the former GOPUSA/Talon News White House correspondent who made the news after asking Bush softball questions, getting into press conferences under an alias (his real name is James Guckert), and being involved with sexual Web sites. Trudeau said he hasn't received any direct reaction from Gannon to the sequence. But on his personal Web site, Gannon on Monday linked to the first "Doonesbury" strip in the sequence, and on Thursday wrote that Trudeau "showed his leanings 30 years ago" -- while linking to one of his old strips that offered a pro-John Kerry view. "Doonesbury" appears in 1,400 newspapers via Universal Press Syndicate. Universal also distributes another comic, "La Cucaracha," which featured a Gannon-inspired sequence that ran before the "Doonesbury" one. Lalo Alcaraz, who started the 10-day story line on March 2, showed "Barrio Bugle" cub reporter Eddie Lopez joining the White House press corps. In a reference to Gannon allegedly being gay, Lopez and a couple of other reporters were dressed like members of the Village People. Such biting wit... Alcaraz said one reason he did the sequence was because Maybe they don't feel like working out their repressed homosexuality on newsprint? Was some of the media protecting the Bush administration? Alcaraz said this was possible, but added that a number of press outlets might have held back because of |
Posted by:Desert Blondie |
#11 oh man. That's rough! |
Posted by: eLarson 2005-03-19 9:25:56 PM |
#10 Or you could take the BBC approach: "Millions the world over have been shocked by your repeated and lascivious affairs with canines of all types, including border collies and rottweilers. Can you tell us, please, why you now intend to have sex with cats?" |
Posted by: Matt 2005-03-19 5:14:45 PM |
#9 I stand corrected - I approve this message |
Posted by: Frank G 2005-03-19 4:41:42 PM |
#8 Better phrasing: "Ms. Bumiller, when did you stop having sex with collies?" |
Posted by: Steve White 2005-03-19 4:38:55 PM |
#7 fine - "does Elizabeth Bumiller (NYT) have sex with collies, yes or no, and if no, what species does she like?" |
Posted by: Frank G 2005-03-19 3:28:17 PM |
#6 Maybe the reason the MSM went soft on the Gannon affair was that the Kos Kiddies have now declared open season on the sexuality of White House reporters. The Gannon affair does seem to establish a precedent, after all ... |
Posted by: Steve White 2005-03-19 3:21:46 PM |
#5 You mean somebody's still paying him to write his drivel? If they make such bad decisions as that, no wonder newspapers are bleeding ink. |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2005-03-19 2:36:42 PM |
#4 He hasn't been relevant since he was PM of Canada. (He wasn't? Then who?) ... never mind. |
Posted by: DMFD 2005-03-19 2:05:49 PM |
#3 Hell, I didn't know Trudeau was still alive. He hasn't had anything relevant to say in, lessee... Hmmm. Has he ever had a relevant and accurate political comment? Perhaps, not. Just another strained pseudo-intellectual voice in the press hegemony of the LLL. |
Posted by: .com 2005-03-19 11:53:03 AM |
#2 Screw Gary Trudeau. |
Posted by: Glereper Craviter7929 2005-03-19 11:52:45 AM |
#1 See? One of Ward Churchill's comrades got it right several days ago - to wit: âI want to look at the attempts by the state and by corporate-driven media to manipulate and coerce its body politic into becoming docile entertainment consumers of US military hegemony.â Corporate-driven media? Maybe that's to half-wit? I always found US Military hegemony more entertaining than "Friends", anyway. |
Posted by: Bobby 2005-03-19 11:31:08 AM |