Submit your comments on this article |
Britain |
New anti-terrorism legislation passed as Abu Qatada sprung |
2005-03-12 |
![]() As exhausted politicians left parliament, some of the country's top terrorism suspects were leaving jail where they had been held without charge or trial for up to three years under old anti-terrorism legislation ruled unlawful by judges last year. A judge ordered their release earlier on Friday on grounds their detention was illegal. Two other terrorist suspects had already been released on bail terms, one on Thursday. Just hours after the new law was passed, the Home Office said "control orders", the central component of the legislation, would be imposed immediately on the eight men -- described by the government and the country's most senior police officer as a serious threat to society. The new control orders would be similar to the tough bail terms that had been set -- that they wear electronic tags, stay home for 12 hours a day and refrain from pre-arranged meetings. The problem is that in the case of people like Abu Qatada, they don't need to meet with anyone to issue orders - they can do it all online. |
Posted by:Dan Darling |
#2 Opponents of the legislation says that goes against 800 years of British tradition, dating from the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215. Somehow, I can't imagine Abu Qatada lasting long among the men who bearded King John. I dunno why. |
Posted by: Fred 2005-03-12 1:07:13 PM |
#1 If someone was the spritual mentor to Mohamed Atta he needs to be dead. I hope someone can figure out how to get to him. I don't care how many Brits it upsets quite frankly. When I heard the BBC has 10 billion dollar war chest to promote it's anti-American and TRANZI propaganda I quit giving a tinkers damn about what the UK thinks. If my government set up a special fund and corporation to undermine the UK and capitalism I think the UK average Joe would rightly be pissed off. The BBC has been pushing for the release of these terrorists. The BBC calls them "militants." These people are clearly terrorists. The BBC is actively seeking to undermine the US led WoT. The BBC is a government sponsored and funded supporter of terrorism. The BBC says they are just unjustly held and have done nothing wrong. The BBC is wrong. Cap a terrorist for Uncle Sam. Cap a BBC âcorrespondentâ for Uncle Sam. Same difference. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2005-03-12 3:11:53 AM |