You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Dowd: Taming of the Shrews
2005-03-07
Maureen Dowd
Arabs put their women in veils. We put ours in the stocks.
Or send them to work for the New York Times...
Every culture has its own way of tamping down female power, be it sexual, political or financial. Americans like to see women who wear the pants be beaten up and humiliated. Afterward, in a gratifying redemption ritual, people like to see the battered women be rewarded.
That's all Americans, right? No exceptions. To include Maureen? Kinky, isn't she?
That's how Hilary Swank won two Oscars. That's how Hillary Clinton won a Senate seat and a presidential front-runner spot. And that's how Martha Stewart won her own reality TV show and became a half-billion dollars richer while she was in prison.
It is? I'm not sure who Hilary Swank is, but Hillary Clinton won her Senate seat and a presidential front-runner spot by being pretty much a consummate politician. She used the tools that were available and she's getting what she wants. Martha Stewart has my sympathy, because she was railroaded, but it had little to do with her sex, much more to do with the fact that there were crooks crawling out from under every rock in sight and she'd done something vaguely similar — without being a consummate politician.
We've come a long way, baby, from the era of witch trials, when women with special power who knew how to curse were burned at the stake. Now, after a public comeuppance, they are staked to a lucrative new career. In this century, the scarlet letter morphs into a dollar sign.
There are millions of women in this country for whom a scarlet letter morphs into nothing but a welfare check.
Maybe temperamental, power-mad divas always needed to be brought down a peg. They used to do it to themselves. Judy Garland and Marilyn Monroe were gorgeous monsters, but were so self-destructive there was no need to punish them further. But Hillary and Martha - the domestic diva with the new ankle bracelet echoed Judy Garland on her Web site yesterday that "there is no place like home" - are not self-destructive. They are brass-knuckled survivors who elicit both admiration and an enmity that Alessandra Stanley memorably dubbed "blondenfreude."
Martha's part of the cultural background noise. A year from now she'll be mentioned in the same context as Lizzie Grubner. Or was it Libby Grubner?
From pornography to "Desperate Housewives," women being degraded has an entertainment value far greater than men being degraded. People liked Hillary and Martha a lot more once they were "broken," like one of Martha's saddle horses, ice queens melted into puddles of vulnerability.
Feeling sorry for yourself, Maureen? No dates recently? Feeling degraded?
Maybe it's because both women sometimes overreached, treated the help badly and displayed an unseemly greedy streak. Maybe it's because a dichotomy about their roles made them seem disingenuous: they gained renown for traditional feminine roles, and apron-and-hearth books, assuming guises to achieve male power and taking a route to the mahogany epicenter through the kitchen. Hillary was America's first lady, photographed smiling in her designer dress as she oversaw table settings and placement for state dinners, even though we knew she did not care about such domestic piffle and was instead maneuvering to take over huge chunks of domestic policy. Martha was America's first lady of gold-leaf designer lifestyle nesting, even though we knew that her ÃŒber-nest was so scary that her husband had flown the coop. Though she was the ultimate professional homemaker and nurturer, she left her daughter out of the litany of things - cats, canaries, horses, chickens and dogs - she would miss in jail.
I'm at a disadvantage here, because I have no idea why Mr. Stewart flew the coop. But one wonders what Maureen's opinion of either Mrs. Clinton or Ms. Stewart would be had they been executives in a different line of work — perhaps vice presidents at Lockheed or Raytheon. Perhaps it was merely their visibility — one in politix, the other in the entertainment industry — that brought them to Maureen's attention. I'd bet my next paycheck she doesn't know the name of the head of Lockheed's information technology division (hint: it's a woman. And she's black.)
Obviously, many men are uncomfortable with successful women, so when these women are brushed back, alpha men can take comfort in knowing that alphettes are not threateningly all-powerful and that they had better soften those sharp edges.
Again, Maureen ignores the real world of actual business and concentrates on the straw world of politix and entertainment. We really have come a long way, baby, in the real world, where men actually do work for women and women for men and the other two logical combinations as well, and without the bugaboo of "sexuality" or gender entering into it any more than shoe size does.
I learned covering Geraldine Ferraro's vice presidential bid that the reaction of women to extraordinarily successful women is also ambivalent, with as much hostility as sisterly pride. An Icarus crash can mitigate the jealousy, while intensifying the feminist attachment. After her husband's philandering with Monica, Hillary played the victim card all the way to the Senate. After her own bad judgment about her stocks, Martha metamorphosed from jailbird to phoenix.
Knock off with the Martha, fergawdsake. The woman was sentenced on a shaky charge. She took her lumps like a grownup, now she's out, and a year from now it'll be mostly forgotten. The small-souled will gloat at her misfortune, never admitting to themselves that they don't have what it takes to do what she's done.
Why don't we need to see Oprah, another titan known by her first name, slapped back? Probably because Oprah never had an icy or phony side to her public persona and because her struggles in her childhood and with her weight take the edge off any animus that might be leveled at her for a net worth of $1.3 billion.
Either that or because nobody particularly cares. If Oprah decides to do a Zsa Zsa imitation and slap a cop, or she proceeds to gut her business enterprises, then that'll change. I suspect she won't do either, because she sells her personality. If the product she's selling isn't the one people are buying, then she'll go out of style. Otherwise she'll keep making money. She realizes that when you're in the personality game, it's not hard to tag yourself out. Maybe she knows Stacey Keach.
And what about Condi, who's now being touted for the Republican ticket in 2008? Perhaps she does not need to play the victim to make people feel better about her power because she was never seen as a termagant, pushing people around and bending them to her will. She always seemed subservient to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, a willing handmaiden and spokesman for their bellicose bidding.
Only in Maureen's special world of straw. I've always seen Condi as a decision maker, giving advice and laying out alternatives for the president. And I'm convinced that if she was in fact a Knickerbocker male that people like Maureen would see her as an eminence grise, exerting sinister influence in the corridors of power in the furtherance of some Bilderberger plot to dominate the world.
One Democratic image maker admiringly predicts that, having survived their virago and victim phases, our two most relentless blondes will outlast everyone: "When the world ends, there will be left only a few cockroaches, Cher, Hillary and Martha."
But at least we'll be rid of Maureen. That's something to look forward to.
Posted by:Fred

#23  Oh, ferchrissakes - I'm Chinese again today.
Be careful how loud you say that, Barbara. There might be FBI agents around, next thing you know they'll be sending flowers and asking you out.
Posted by: Steve   2005-03-07 3:30:20 PM  

#22  Oh, ferchrissakes - I'm Chinese again today.

I thought sure I put my name in this computer too. :-(
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-03-07 1:44:25 PM  

#21  #2 phil_b:
"women being degraded has an entertainment value far greater than men being degraded." She musn't have watched an American sitcom in a very long time.
Or an American commercial.
Posted by: Chinese Unomoger1553   2005-03-07 1:39:24 PM  

#20  She's trapped in the "Bozone", an area of impermeability surrounding a completelty clueless person that prohibits the transfer of intelligence. No intelligence going in or out. In this case, however, the indications are there is no level of intelligence within this person's Bozone.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-03-07 12:42:20 PM  

#19  Well, if anyone knows anything about shrews, it's gotta be MoDo.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-03-07 11:27:10 AM  

#18  Mmmmmmmmmmmm...mushrooms!
Posted by: MoDo   2005-03-07 10:25:40 AM  

#17  I think Maureen needs a hug.
Posted by: eLarson   2005-03-07 10:21:02 AM  

#16  BTW - I've gone thru the "really liked, disliked/liked" Michael Douglas phases as his career has gone up/down/up.
The fact he dumped MoDo for Catherine Zeta Jones, however, makes him look like the smartest (and luckiest) man in the world! Now I'm just jealous :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-07 9:51:21 AM  

#15  I love smart, confident, beautiful women. That's why MoDo turns me off. A neurotic little bitch still wishing for her high school girl's clique days. The NYT should be embarrassed for paying her, much less printing her whines
Posted by: Frank G   2005-03-07 9:45:06 AM  

#14  Oh, please! I didn't think that it was possible to write a unconciously politically correct satire of political correctness. But she did it.
Posted by: Highlander   2005-03-07 9:21:46 AM  

#13  Mike V #3- ditto

Condi was subservient to Bush That was the sole purpose of her yawning screed.

Condi - the talking points are out. It's been decided that you will be portrayed as the house mammy, Sally Hemmings, to be exact. Expect more of those kissing photos with her and Bush - to further the impression of her being not just a beautiful, intelligent, n*^^er, but available after dinner for her masters. It never ceases to amaze how low the current left will stoop.
Posted by: 2b   2005-03-07 9:01:49 AM  

#12  Gee, Condi was subservient to Bush. Isn't that a reasonable summation of the Boss - employee relationship?

I know I damn well better be subservient to my Boss or I won't have one! (Other than my wife but that's another story of a strong, but, non-termagant womant)
Posted by: AlanC   2005-03-07 8:32:40 AM  

#11  Love the poster! It's an incredible movie, too, particularly the MST3K version.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-03-07 8:11:14 AM  

#10  I learned covering Geraldine Ferraro's vice presidential bid that the reaction of women to extraordinarily successful women is also ambivalent, with as much hostility as sisterly pride.

And for a perfect example of this, let's look at MoDo's own writing a few sentences later:

And what about Condi, who's now being touted for the Republican ticket in 2008? Perhaps she does not need to play the victim to make people feel better about her power because she was never seen as a termagant, pushing people around and bending them to her will. She always seemed subservient to President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, a willing handmaiden and spokesman for their bellicose bidding.

Me-ow. What a poison pen. Of course, just last week the world saw Condi 'bending Hosni Mumbarak to her will.' And the consequences could be historic. That's what is called exercising power. Condi does it because she's qualified and cares about substance. MoDo is so shallow that she cannot get beyond image. That's why she can see an ostensible connection between Clinton and Stewart where none really exists and it's why the article ignores any details about what Martha actually did.
Posted by: John in Tokyo   2005-03-07 2:05:23 AM  

#9  The Times editor messed up. It should have been "When the world ends, there will be left only a few cockroaches: Cher, Hillary and Martha."
Posted by: Pappy   2005-03-07 1:30:35 AM  

#8  Fred, Hilary Swank won an Oscar for Best Actress for her role in the film "Million Dollar Baby," in which she played a female boxer.

Rather than try to summarize the movie I think I'll just say that I don't think she understood it.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2005-03-07 1:21:43 AM  

#7  I had to look up the word "termagent"

It means, a quarrelsome, scolding woman; a shrew; which is apparently how Dowd sees Hillary and Martha.

Oddly enough, the etymology of the word is that it is based on an imaginary Muslim deity that appeared in old French religious propaganda dramas and was imported to England with the Normans. The character Tervagant appears in the dramas as a shewish but powerful character.
Posted by: mhw   2005-03-07 1:11:15 AM  

#6  Its interesting that many subcultures need to promote a 'we are victims' line. Its by no means restricted to feminists. You see it in religions (not just Islam) all the time. It seems especially prevalent in groups that have a weak rational for existing.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-03-07 12:54:50 AM  

#5  She is off her Zoloft again I see.
Posted by: FlameBait   2005-03-07 12:42:43 AM  

#4  Smart strong wymyn are skeery? Shit, they're the coolest friends, the sexiest, most intriguing, most desirable femalians on the planet.

Dowd's suffering from Femalian Neural Envy - females terminally jealous of the other females who have more than one neuron.

Wotta jackass.

One has to wonder if Dowdy ever emerges from the deep pit that is her personal brand of insanity. Nothing she has written in the last 3 years bears any resemblance to reality - you know, that world the rest of us live in.

She should be, if she's not now, the All-Time Mega-Meds Poster Child.
Posted by: .com   2005-03-07 12:34:52 AM  

#3  Without your pithy comments I would never have made it to the end of the article...and for that she gets paid? This passes for what, exactly? Journalism? Opine? Could you imagine being stuck alone somewhere with her? Quick, pass the bottle!
Posted by: Mike Villierme   2005-03-07 12:31:36 AM  

#2  women being degraded has an entertainment value far greater than men being degraded. She musn't have watched an American sitcom in a very long time.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-03-07 12:14:01 AM  

#1  I nominate this column as MoDo's worst. I know, I know, it's so hard to choose, but the self-loathing in this one makes me want to find her sometime on Fifth Avenue, walk up, point at her, and just start laughing. She wouldn't feel any worse.
Posted by: Steve White   2005-03-07 12:09:19 AM  

00:00