You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Goofy protesters against Iraq war ripple across Britain
2005-02-16
Dozens of people opposed to the war in Iraq held a "die-in" outside the Houses of Parliament in London, demanding that British troops come home, while similar rallies took place across the country.
Was that two dozen or three?
The events, organized by the Stop The War Coalition and Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), marked the second anniversary of a huge and even more stupid anti-war march which attracted more than one million foolish people to the British capital in an ultimately futile bid to stop the March 2003 invasion to topple Saddam Hussein.
How's it feel to protest in favor of Saddam?
Brief scuffles broke out in the British capital between police and frauds demonstrators as officers attempted to move the loonies crowd, who were chanting slogans and holding banners, back on to the central area of Parliament Square.
I've often wondered if a "bury-in" would be the appropriate way to handle a "die-in." That would have to come after the "embalm-in," of course. Wouldn't want them to stink.
"Our die-in was held to symbolize the tens of thousands who have died in Iraq since the war began. We are also calling for the troops to be withdrawn," said Lindsey German, of the Stop The War Coalition.
"Not that we'd do anything, you know, important.
"We think it's significant that America and Britain don't count the number of Iraqi dead, but they do count the number of their troops who have died."
Sure honey, and why do you think that is?
Kate Hudson, chairwoman of the CND, said that the rally was to step up demands that the "occupation of Iraq should end. She warned, however, that the failure of the first anti-war protest in 2003 -- which she described as "one of the greatest outpourings of public feeling" -- was a bad omen for future possible strikes on countries such as Iran. Prime Minister "Tony Blair didn't listen then and we don't expect him to listen in the future with regard to withdrawing troops or an attack on Iran -- that's one of our greatest concerns," she said.
For once we're in agreement -- I don't expect Tony to listen to you either.
Other events were held in towns and cities nationwide, including a peace vigil in Canterbury, another "die-in" in Plymouth and leafleting outside an army recruitment office in Edinburgh. In addition, the organizers plan to hold another demonstration in London on March 19 -- two years after the war began -- to demand that British troops be brought home.
Which may attract, oh, FOUR dozen ninnies.
Whoopsie! Part of the rent-a-mob was pulling duty at the Michael Jackson trial. The economy's getting better; more folks have j-o-b-s now.
Posted by:Steve White

#15  after IED explosions? Ima thinkr we give em forks and let em probe the roadsides of Free Iraq for buried treasure
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-16 7:11:09 PM  

#14  I think we've found the "volunteers" we need to clean up after IED explosions. Britain needs to re-instate press-ganging, just for that purpose, and use these types of rallies to "select" the "proper candidates". I'm sure such actions would improve both Britain and Iraq.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2005-02-16 6:29:49 PM  

#13  Apt that the sign in the front row reads "Peace in our time"
Either they've forgotten the history of that phrase, the picture was Photoshopped, or the British contigent of Protest Warrior is on duty.
Posted by: Steve   2005-02-16 2:22:50 PM  

#12  Too bad a bulldozer didn't have to go through the street infront of Parliament. I hear they block out screams and prevent the driver from seeing what's in front of him in "certain" occasions.
Posted by: Charles   2005-02-16 1:26:46 PM  

#11  Maybe they should try a massive hunger strike

Unless they staged it in North Korea or Zimbabwe, I don't think they could muster the "massive turnout" that they would hope for.
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-16 11:58:59 AM  

#10  Maybe they should try a massive hunger strike until the troops are brought home. That is if they want more than empty gestures (pun intended).
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-02-16 11:07:15 AM  

#9  CND? Isn't that the group that was protesting Pershing missiles back in the 80's?
I guess the connection between Libya giving up their nuclear ambitions after the invasion of Iraq totally escapes them.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-02-16 10:53:33 AM  

#8  I wonder if the sign holder realized that his slogan was the same as Nevil Chamberlain's in '36 after a deal was signed with Chancellor Hitler.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-16 10:13:10 AM  

#7  No, no, no!
Not peace in our time, Peas in our thyme
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-02-16 10:06:20 AM  

#6  Bush lied! People died! er, sort of. For about an hour.
Posted by: BH   2005-02-16 10:00:38 AM  

#5  not done yet... you can get more people to show up for the placement of a stop-light, than these "experts" are able to pull.
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-16 8:06:56 AM  

#4  *Snicker* These are professional organizers yet their crowd can only draw what would amount to the staff at CND and Stop the War, their spouses and kids. There's lots of moonbats in this world. Apparently, even the moonbats aren't showing up anymore.
Posted by: 2b   2005-02-16 8:02:52 AM  

#3  Dozens of people That says it all. The MSM is hyping what elsewhere would be mistaken for a bus queue.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-02-16 7:12:31 AM  

#2  Apt that the sign in the front row reads "Peace in our time" - these anoraks stand for appeasement plain and simple. I'm sure they'd love to live within the target range of an Iranian nuke.
Posted by: Howard UK   2005-02-16 4:46:44 AM  

#1  I like the idea of a "die in." How many died? Can we do it every week? We need to have the police there to make sure they follow through, helping along any that back out.
Posted by: jackal   2005-02-16 12:09:43 AM  

00:00