You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Olde Tyme Religion
Valentine's Day Enrages Jihadists
2005-02-15
On Valentine's Day, it's important to note the emergence of an eternally verified reality: Love is the strongest human force fighting against terrorism and jihad.

"Al Gharam mamn'uh, al Gharam kufr," screamed the self-declared cleric in al-Ansar's chat room this Friday. "Love is forbidden, love is infidel" -- said the online fatwa about the "legitimacy of loving and being in love."

A weekend before Valentine's Day, jihadist souls were not questioning the "commercialization" of romance, but inquiring about the ban on "being in love." The "scholars" said human love is evil. The simple feeling of being attracted to or in love with someone is a terrifying sin if it is committed outside of their religious dogma -- and it warrants serious punishment.

"Al Hub" (basic love) -- said one of the scholars online -- "is not permissible outside commitment to Jihad." The subject of romantic love was new and overwhelming to the al-Qaeda sympathizers, who were busy dodging the "decadent feeling." But it was too close chronologically, too well publicized, and too difficult to escape on the web.

Suddenly, a marquee rolled an ad for Valentine's Day in the room. The room shouted its objections, but the ideologue could not ignore reality. "Sometimes we'll have to absorb our reaction and control ourselves. This Valentine Day is a dark day, it is poison, but by the will of Allah when the Caliphate will be established, Valentine will be smashed."

But there was a concern: Valentines is "ravaging" the region, including under the most restrictive regimes. They are right to worry: the battle for love is as wide as the call for jihad.

In Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, girls were severely punished for not being escorted by male relatives, or for not wearing burqas. Chatting with someone from the other gender was a crime. Movies, mixed-schools, radios, music, and poetry were banned. Valentine's Day in Kabul was equated to Satan.

In Saudi Arabia, women still can't drive or vote, much less date. Valentine's Day is illegal. In Iran, high school girls cannot hold hands with their boyfriends. Imitations exist in Iraq's Zarqawi enclaves and in Beirut's Hezbollah suburb.

But the revolution is rising. The "love guerrillas" are spreading on the street and on the internet. In liberated Afghanistan, transistor radios air love songs. In Iran, boys and girls have waged the revolt of "kissing in public." Tracked by the militia, the teenagers perform the kiss-and-run tactic.

In Kuwait, tactics are evolving. In this oil-rich state, young Arabs buy two cell phones, and as they see the beloved driving by, they throw one of the mobiles in her car; then the telephonic romance can begin.

In West Jerusalem, young Palestinians who want to stroll freely with their girlfriends, walk up the Yehuda street speaking Hebrew. In Egypt, soap operas compete with their Mexican counterparts. Love warfare has become the boldest threat that can roll back jihad.

On the internet, Arab, Persian, Kurdish, Aramaic, and other love and music chat rooms attract ten times the al-Ansar-crowded rooms. There, you read and hear discussions of love; they seek, not decadence, but the early stages of a romantic revolution.

Lebanon's TV has taken the freedom for love to sophisticated artistic expressions. With shows seen by millions, the LBCI has been shaking off the fundamentalist quarters of the region. On al Jazeera, clerics are horrified by the scenes. Their deepest nightmare is to see young Saudi men singing the beauty of human love, while their jihadist counterparts are assassinating young Iraqi women in Fallujah for not wearing the hijab.

This region has a massive and underreported potential to become a culture of romantic passion. We must remember that Adonis and Ashtarut, antiquity's gods of love, were Phoenician legends. Cleopatra was an Egyptian Queen. The lovers of pre-Islamic Arabia, Antar and Ablah, were the precursors of Romeo and Juliet. And that the Sherazade of the one thousand and one nights and Omar were Persians.

From the twentieth century, let's remember that Um Kalthum, the voice from Egypt, Said Akl, the poet from Lebanon, and Khalid, the rock singer from Algeria, have sculpted love in the hearts and minds of hundreds of millions of these people.

The B-52s may have been successful in Tora Bora, but Radio SAWA and its sisters are triggering deeper instincts.

The followers of love have no weapon except human nature; it is the only one they need. Valentine's Day may be infidel in the eyes of the jihadists, but it has many more faithful followers among the peoples of this unlucky region. The terrorists are not intimidated by death, but they are terrorized by love.
Posted by:tipper

#7  Oh, yeah, Eric Jablow. Now I see. THOSE kinds of B-52s. I thought that you meant that we send B-52s over Saudi Arabia, Iran, et al, and drop 40,000 lbs of RED valentine cards over all major population centers. Give the religious police apoplexy.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-02-15 10:06:00 PM  

#6  The Jihadists are really afraid of the B-52s:


The Love Shack is a little old place where we can get together
Love Shack baby, Love Shack bay-bee.
Love shack, baby, love shack Love shack, baby, love shack
Love baby, that's where it's at, Ooo love baby, that's where it's at
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2005-02-15 10:01:44 PM  

#5  Valentine's Day Enrages Jihadists?
Couldn't be happier with a Headline. Piss em off royally and smile.

But there was a concern: Valentines is “ravaging” the region, including under the most restrictive regimes. They are right to worry: the battle for love is as wide as the call for jihad.

I'll bet, with all the repressed little Islamic fellows running around. Seriously speaking, though, if all that lust were unleashed at once, it could bode poorly for women in Islam. There is no self-restraint in that part of the world and there is an ingrained cultural norm of blaming/shaming women about sex. Where would the internal restraint on the part of sexually repressed and frustrated men come in if they can continue to blame their sexual acts on the women in the society? Would the laws against premarital/extramarital sex simply vanish once the folks rediscover lust or would we see a rise in honor killings, rapes...?
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-02-15 4:19:12 PM  

#4  "Al Gharam mamn’uh, al Gharam kufr," screamed the self-declared cleric in al-Ansar’s chat room this Friday. “Love is forbidden, love is infidel” -- said the online fatwa about the “legitimacy of loving and being in love.”

Yo! Turban dude! If love is so infidel, where'd you come from? Did a buzzard lay you on a tree stump? Or, are you claiming virgin birth, which your boy Muhammad the Prophet says is a no-no. Which is it?
Posted by: BigEd   2005-02-15 4:03:59 PM  

#3  Like I've said before, these guys just need to get laid and maybe drink a few beers, mellow them right out. Too much pent up hostility, just not right to be that repressed.
Posted by: Jarhead   2005-02-15 2:33:28 PM  

#2  But, But, if they fall in love that means they'll have... babies!! And that means more of them!

Nuke them now! Nuke them Now! NUKE THEM NOW!!!!

Say BOOOOOOOMMMMM!!!! (or "Mommy"....)
Posted by: IToldYa1000Times   2005-02-15 1:48:55 PM  

#1  this doesn't surprise me
Posted by: Thraing Hupoluper1864   2005-02-15 11:56:27 AM  

00:00